[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools due to missing TCF RSE
|
Thanks Doug.
On 10/27/2011 03:56 PM, Schaefer, Doug wrote:
It's there now. You can pick it up from our normal cdt-nighly p2 repo:
http://download.eclipse.org/tools/cdt/builds/juno/nightly.
Sorry for the delays,
Doug.
-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Schaefer, Doug
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 3:27 PM
To: Jeff Johnston
Cc: CDT General developers list.
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools due to missing
TCF RSE
There is no buildsite.xml any more. We have our own CDT aggregation that
brings together CDT, TCF and EDC and that's managed out of our
org.eclipse.cdt.master.git repo. It's a simple tycho p2 build that uses the
category.xml file to determine what features to include in the p2 repo.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Johnston [mailto:jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 3:23 PM
To: Schaefer, Doug
Cc: CDT General developers list.
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools due to
missing TCF RSE
Does the feature need to be added to buildsite.xml?
-- Jeff J.
On 10/27/2011 02:52 PM, Schaefer, Doug wrote:
Yeah, not sure what happened there. I see the category.xml is the
right
version, but it tcf.rse never got picked up. I'll clean the workspace
and try again.
-----Original Message-----
From: J. Johnston [mailto:jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 12:37 PM
To: Schaefer, Doug
Cc: CDT General developers list.
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools due
to missing TCF RSE
Doug, I just took a look at the cdt-master.zip for the last
cdt-master-nightly build. It has a bunch of TCF stuff, but no
tcf.rse plug-in or feature. Am I missing something or did
something not
build?
I saw your commit message from build #60.
-- Jeff J.
On 10/26/2011 12:03 PM, Schaefer, Doug wrote:
I also just notice that Juno is off a week due to EcilpseCon Europe.
So our
+1 date is actually Nov 7. I won't be at ECE so will do a CDT push
+to Juno on
Monday anyway. We can update it again on the 7'th.
-----Original Message-----
From: J. Johnston [mailto:jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 11:47 AM
To: CDT General developers list.
Cc: Schaefer, Doug
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools due
to missing TCF RSE
Doug is this resolved?
-- Jeff J.
On 10/14/2011 06:40 PM, Schaefer, Doug wrote:
I'll see what I can do. I should really get this cleared up by M3.
Cheers,
Doug.
-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of J. Johnston
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 4:42 PM
To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools
due to missing TCF RSE
On 10/11/2011 04:26 PM, Schaefer, Doug wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Marc Khouzam
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 4:22 PM
To: 'CDT General developers list.'
Cc: TCF Development (tcf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools
due to missing TCF RSE
-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Schaefer,
Doug
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 4:14 PM
To: CDT General developers list.
Cc: TCF Development (tcf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux
Tools due to missing TCF RSE
Hi Jeff, this is actually probably a question for tcf-dev.
There is a bit of history here. The TCF on the release train
has only been enough to satisfy the dependency for CDT's EDC
debugger.
RSE wasn't part of that. So if it has been included in the
past, it was by accident.
Now, that'll change for Juno
So CDT will require RSE? I'm happy about this as it makes
remote debug launches more user-friendly.
I'm curious to know the motivation behind this dependency
though.
Sorry if I missed something said earlier.
Two points there. 1) I didn't say that, and 2) the CDT remote
launch already
depends on RSE.
The question is where do we put the TCF RSE plug-in on the
release train,
or any of TCF for that matter. Or maybe it just remains hidden
so client plug- ins can satisfy their dependencies.
Doug
We don't have any thoughts on how it should be exposed to the
end-user, but we would certainly like a solution in the
near-term as
M3+0 is coming up Oct 28th. Is there an issue with at least
including it the way it was done in Indigo until you come up
with a better
long-term solution?
-- Jeff J.
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
