Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools due to missing TCF RSE

I also just notice that Juno is off a week due to EcilpseCon Europe. So our +1 date is actually Nov 7. I won't be at ECE so will do a CDT push to Juno on Monday anyway. We can update it again on the 7'th. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: J. Johnston [mailto:jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 11:47 AM
> To: CDT General developers list.
> Cc: Schaefer, Doug
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools due to missing
> TCF RSE
> 
> Doug is this resolved?
> 
> -- Jeff J.
> 
> On 10/14/2011 06:40 PM, Schaefer, Doug wrote:
> > I'll see what I can do. I should really get this cleared up by M3.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Doug.
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> >> On Behalf Of J. Johnston
> >> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 4:42 PM
> >> To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools due to
> >> missing TCF RSE
> >>
> >> On 10/11/2011 04:26 PM, Schaefer, Doug wrote:
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> >>>> On Behalf Of Marc Khouzam
> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 4:22 PM
> >>>> To: 'CDT General developers list.'
> >>>> Cc: TCF Development (tcf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx)
> >>>> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools due
> >>>> to missing TCF RSE
> >>>>
> >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Schaefer, Doug
> >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 4:14 PM
> >>>>> To: CDT General developers list.
> >>>>> Cc: TCF Development (tcf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx)
> >>>>> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools due
> >>>>> to missing TCF RSE
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi Jeff, this is actually probably a question for tcf-dev.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> There is a bit of history here. The TCF on the release train has
> >>>>> only been enough to satisfy the dependency for CDT's EDC debugger.
> >>>>> RSE wasn't part of that. So if it has been included in the past,
> >>>>> it was by accident.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Now, that'll change for Juno
> >>>>
> >>>> So CDT will require RSE?  I'm happy about this as it makes remote
> >>>> debug launches more user-friendly.
> >>>> I'm curious to know the motivation behind this dependency though.
> >>>> Sorry if I missed something said earlier.
> >>>
> >>> Two points there. 1) I didn't say that, and 2) the CDT remote launch
> >>> already
> >> depends on RSE.
> >>>
> >>> The question is where do we put the TCF RSE plug-in on the release
> >>> train,
> >> or any of TCF for that matter. Or maybe it just remains hidden so
> >> client plug- ins can satisfy their dependencies.
> >>>
> >>> Doug
> >>>
> >>
> >> We don't have any thoughts on how it should be exposed to the
> >> end-user, but we would certainly like a solution in the near-term as
> >> M3+0 is coming up Oct 28th.  Is there an issue with at least
> >> including it the way it was done in Indigo until you come up with a better
> long-term solution?
> >>
> >> -- Jeff J.
> >>
> >>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> cdt-dev mailing list
> >>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cdt-dev mailing list
> >> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > cdt-dev mailing list
> > cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >



Back to the top