Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools due to missing TCF

["Schaefer, Doug" <Doug.Schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yeah, not sure what happened there. I see the category.xml is the right version, but it tcf.rse never got picked up. I'll clean the workspace and try again.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: J. Johnston [mailto:jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 12:37 PM
> To: Schaefer, Doug
> Cc: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools due to missing
> TCF RSE
> 
> Doug, I just took a look at the cdt-master.zip for the last cdt-master-nightly
> build.  It has a bunch of TCF stuff, but no tcf.rse plug-in or feature.  Am I
> missing something or did something not build?
>   I saw your commit message from build #60.
> 
> -- Jeff J.
> 
> On 10/26/2011 12:03 PM, Schaefer, Doug wrote:
> > I also just notice that Juno is off a week due to EcilpseCon Europe. So our
> +1 date is actually Nov 7. I won't be at ECE so will do a CDT push to Juno on
> Monday anyway. We can update it again on the 7'th.
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: J. Johnston [mailto:jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 11:47 AM
> >> To: CDT General developers list.
> >> Cc: Schaefer, Doug
> >> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools due to
> >> missing TCF RSE
> >>
> >> Doug is this resolved?
> >>
> >> -- Jeff J.
> >>
> >> On 10/14/2011 06:40 PM, Schaefer, Doug wrote:
> >>> I'll see what I can do. I should really get this cleared up by M3.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Doug.
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> >>>> On Behalf Of J. Johnston
> >>>> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 4:42 PM
> >>>> To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools due
> >>>> to missing TCF RSE
> >>>>
> >>>> On 10/11/2011 04:26 PM, Schaefer, Doug wrote:
> >>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> >>>>>> On Behalf Of Marc Khouzam
> >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 4:22 PM
> >>>>>> To: 'CDT General developers list.'
> >>>>>> Cc: TCF Development (tcf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx)
> >>>>>> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools due
> >>>>>> to missing TCF RSE
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>>> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>>> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Schaefer,
> Doug
> >>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 4:14 PM
> >>>>>>> To: CDT General developers list.
> >>>>>>> Cc: TCF Development (tcf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx)
> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools
> >>>>>>> due to missing TCF RSE
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi Jeff, this is actually probably a question for tcf-dev.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> There is a bit of history here. The TCF on the release train has
> >>>>>>> only been enough to satisfy the dependency for CDT's EDC
> debugger.
> >>>>>>> RSE wasn't part of that. So if it has been included in the past,
> >>>>>>> it was by accident.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Now, that'll change for Juno
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So CDT will require RSE?  I'm happy about this as it makes remote
> >>>>>> debug launches more user-friendly.
> >>>>>> I'm curious to know the motivation behind this dependency though.
> >>>>>> Sorry if I missed something said earlier.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Two points there. 1) I didn't say that, and 2) the CDT remote
> >>>>> launch already
> >>>> depends on RSE.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The question is where do we put the TCF RSE plug-in on the release
> >>>>> train,
> >>>> or any of TCF for that matter. Or maybe it just remains hidden so
> >>>> client plug- ins can satisfy their dependencies.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Doug
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> We don't have any thoughts on how it should be exposed to the
> >>>> end-user, but we would certainly like a solution in the near-term
> >>>> as
> >>>> M3+0 is coming up Oct 28th.  Is there an issue with at least
> >>>> including it the way it was done in Indigo until you come up with a
> >>>> better
> >> long-term solution?
> >>>>
> >>>> -- Jeff J.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> cdt-dev mailing list
> >>>>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> cdt-dev mailing list
> >>>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> cdt-dev mailing list
> >>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >>>
> >
> >