Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools due to missing TCF

["Schaefer, Doug" <Doug.Schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

There is no buildsite.xml any more. We have our own CDT aggregation that brings together CDT, TCF and EDC and that's managed out of our org.eclipse.cdt.master.git repo. It's a simple tycho p2 build that uses the category.xml file to determine what features to include in the p2 repo.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Johnston [mailto:jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 3:23 PM
> To: Schaefer, Doug
> Cc: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools due to missing
> TCF RSE
> 
> Does the feature need to be added to buildsite.xml?
> 
> -- Jeff J.
> 
> On 10/27/2011 02:52 PM, Schaefer, Doug wrote:
> > Yeah, not sure what happened there. I see the category.xml is the right
> version, but it tcf.rse never got picked up. I'll clean the workspace and try
> again.
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: J. Johnston [mailto:jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx]
> >> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 12:37 PM
> >> To: Schaefer, Doug
> >> Cc: CDT General developers list.
> >> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools due to
> >> missing TCF RSE
> >>
> >> Doug, I just took a look at the cdt-master.zip for the last
> >> cdt-master-nightly build.  It has a bunch of TCF stuff, but no
> >> tcf.rse plug-in or feature.  Am I missing something or did something not
> build?
> >>    I saw your commit message from build #60.
> >>
> >> -- Jeff J.
> >>
> >> On 10/26/2011 12:03 PM, Schaefer, Doug wrote:
> >>> I also just notice that Juno is off a week due to EcilpseCon Europe.
> >>> So our
> >> +1 date is actually Nov 7. I won't be at ECE so will do a CDT push to
> >> +Juno on
> >> Monday anyway. We can update it again on the 7'th.
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: J. Johnston [mailto:jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx]
> >>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 11:47 AM
> >>>> To: CDT General developers list.
> >>>> Cc: Schaefer, Doug
> >>>> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools due
> >>>> to missing TCF RSE
> >>>>
> >>>> Doug is this resolved?
> >>>>
> >>>> -- Jeff J.
> >>>>
> >>>> On 10/14/2011 06:40 PM, Schaefer, Doug wrote:
> >>>>> I'll see what I can do. I should really get this cleared up by M3.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>> Doug.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> >>>>>> On Behalf Of J. Johnston
> >>>>>> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 4:42 PM
> >>>>>> To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools due
> >>>>>> to missing TCF RSE
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 10/11/2011 04:26 PM, Schaefer, Doug wrote:
> >>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>>>> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>>>> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> >>>>>>>> On Behalf Of Marc Khouzam
> >>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 4:22 PM
> >>>>>>>> To: 'CDT General developers list.'
> >>>>>>>> Cc: TCF Development (tcf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx)
> >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools
> >>>>>>>> due to missing TCF RSE
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>>>>> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>>>>> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Schaefer,
> >> Doug
> >>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 4:14 PM
> >>>>>>>>> To: CDT General developers list.
> >>>>>>>>> Cc: TCF Development (tcf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx)
> >>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools
> >>>>>>>>> due to missing TCF RSE
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi Jeff, this is actually probably a question for tcf-dev.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> There is a bit of history here. The TCF on the release train
> >>>>>>>>> has only been enough to satisfy the dependency for CDT's EDC
> >> debugger.
> >>>>>>>>> RSE wasn't part of that. So if it has been included in the
> >>>>>>>>> past, it was by accident.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Now, that'll change for Juno
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> So CDT will require RSE?  I'm happy about this as it makes
> >>>>>>>> remote debug launches more user-friendly.
> >>>>>>>> I'm curious to know the motivation behind this dependency
> though.
> >>>>>>>> Sorry if I missed something said earlier.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Two points there. 1) I didn't say that, and 2) the CDT remote
> >>>>>>> launch already
> >>>>>> depends on RSE.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The question is where do we put the TCF RSE plug-in on the
> >>>>>>> release train,
> >>>>>> or any of TCF for that matter. Or maybe it just remains hidden so
> >>>>>> client plug- ins can satisfy their dependencies.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Doug
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We don't have any thoughts on how it should be exposed to the
> >>>>>> end-user, but we would certainly like a solution in the near-term
> >>>>>> as
> >>>>>> M3+0 is coming up Oct 28th.  Is there an issue with at least
> >>>>>> including it the way it was done in Indigo until you come up with
> >>>>>> a better
> >>>> long-term solution?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -- Jeff J.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> cdt-dev mailing list
> >>>>>>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> cdt-dev mailing list
> >>>>>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> cdt-dev mailing list
> >>>>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >