| Re: [kura-dev] question about kura's configuration service |
From: kura-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [kura-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] on behalf of Jens Reimann [jreimann@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2017 11:31 PM
To: Kura Developers mailing list
Subject: Re: [kura-dev] question about kura's configuration service
Hi Scott,
On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 11:33 PM, Lewis, ScottX <scottx.lewis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Jens,
<stuff deleted>
[Scott] Do you expect these to be implemented via ConfigurationPlugins?
I have no expectations at the moment ;-) But if you have a good idea. let's discuss it!
[Scott] FWIW, I do think that if possible, it would make sense to use the ConfigurationPlugin extension mechanism for ConfigurationAdmin. We/Intel may have to create a ConfigurationPlugin ourselves that uses Metatype so I've been looking into this recently.
I don't think that all things can be achieved by the ConfigurationPlugins btw, some may be. But not all.
[Scott] I notice from looking that the draft specs that the ConfigurationPlugin api is getting an overhaul in OSGi R7 spec, so I imagine that they are attempting to make the ConfigurationAdmin service more extensible...without requiring a ConfigurationAdmin service replacement.
Scott
_______________________________________________
kura-dev mailing list
kura-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/kura-dev