| Re: [kura-dev] question about kura's configuration service |
|
Hi Jens,
<stuff deleted>
I have no expectations at the moment ;-) But if you have a good idea. let's discuss it!
[Scott] FWIW, I do think that if possible, it would make sense to use the ConfigurationPlugin extension mechanism for ConfigurationAdmin. We/Intel may have to create a ConfigurationPlugin ourselves that uses Metatype so I've been looking into this recently.
I already looked into the Equinox CM in the base, due to some bugs I encountered. It is quite .. well ... suboptimal. So I switched to Apache Felix CM. Which works great! I also heard a bit about a reference implementation for the OSGi R7 CM.
[Scott] From where/whom? If you have any info about that please post any links. Also...are the R7 spec additions for CM significant? Do you happen to know the RFP?
So my plan was to look into R7 and then maybe build something based on top of that or based on Apache Felix CM. And of course look for anything else "out there" before implementing something. So if you have a good idea, now would be the best time ;-)
[Scott] FWIW, unless there is something in R7 that just can't be lived without, I suggest using the R6 (rather than R7) spec and full impl (e.g. Felix CM).
Scott
|