Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [rt-pmc] RT PMC calls scheduled to resume
While you could argue that there is not a great deal of project wide collaboration in either Tools or Technology, those two top level projects have a number of sub-projects that contribute to the release train. Of course that makes sense, since the train is primarily focused on the IDE and development tools.

Since the Planning Council is meeting tomorrow, I'll get up early for an RT PMC call to see if there is anything I should bring forward.

Cheers,
Ian


On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Thomas Watson <tjwatson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

If folks find it useful, monthly calls are fine with me also.

Tom



Inactive hide details for Jesse McConnell ---09/03/2013 04:18:58 PM---agreed, and that we have not worked out any sort of more Jesse McConnell ---09/03/2013 04:18:58 PM---agreed, and that we have not worked out any sort of more RT wide collaboration up to this point (min

From: Jesse McConnell <jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Runtime Project PMC mailing list <rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date: 09/03/2013 04:18 PM


Subject: Re: [rt-pmc] RT PMC calls scheduled to resume
Sent by: rt-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx



agreed, and that we have not worked out any sort of more RT wide collaboration up to this point (minus Jeff McAffer's efforts with starter kids years ago) probably limits the needs of the RT group meeting more regularly...

fwiw I think monthly meetings are good at least because it does help reinforce RT community participation a bit between ourselves and provides a good back and forth for navigating eclipse internal processes, etc

every 2 weeks was good from that perspective as well so I really don't mind that schedule....monthly is fine as well

jesse

--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx


On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

    >  but it does make the RT PMC really just a holding place where RT 'type'
    eclipse projects can live without taking on the task of being a top level
    eclipse project.

    This is not unusual. Both the Tools and the Technology top-level projects
    come to mind as similar examples. It still makes sense to group projects
    which are in somewhat similar domains, or we would have hundreds of projects
    ending up in Technology.

    _______________________________________________
    rt-pmc mailing list
    rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
    https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc


_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc




--
R. Ian Bull | EclipseSource Victoria | +1 250 477 7484
http://eclipsesource.com | http://twitter.com/eclipsesource

GIF image

Back to the top