Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [linuxtools-dev] Juno SR1 Release

Thank you very much
Bernd

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I managed to update the build.  I broke the then on-going Hudson build by
> fiddling with the contents of  the Linux Tools SR1 repo at the same time,
> but the following build with my change just went through successfully.
>
> -- Jeff J.
>
>
> On 09/12/2012 01:51 PM, Bernd Hufmann wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jeff
>>
>> The fixes are not crucial. They are more for a special setup and
>> condition. If you're not able to include it today for RC3, then I'm ok
>> to not include it for RC4/SR1. Just to be on the save side.
>>
>> Linux Tools 1.2 is also coming in November and then we'll have the fixes
>> in.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Bernd
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Jeff Johnston<jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The system is not automated.  I test aggregation and then make that the
>>> stable build.  We are in RC3 now and should be stabilizing.
>>>
>>> What bug fixes did you make?  Are they crucial?  Today is +3 aggregation
>>> day
>>> and
>>> I can't seem to log into build.eclipse.org.  There is a chance I can get
>>> it
>>> in today, but I am not having success in logging into build.eclipse.org
>>> and
>>> staying logged in.
>>>
>>> Next week is the last aggregation build.  If we fail aggregation then we
>>> are
>>> in big trouble so if I can't get your stuff in today, you will have to
>>> justify the changes are crucial for RC4.  Note that the RC4 build will
>>> become 1.1.1.
>>>
>>> Don't forget that users can still get fixes via updates-nightly-juno
>>> after
>>> SR1 is released.
>>>
>>> -- Jeff J.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/12/2012 12:51 PM, Bernd Hufmann wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello
>>>>
>>>> Which build are we planning to use for SR1 RC4? I'm asking that
>>>> because RC3 was build and labelled on Hudson on September 6th.
>>>> However, I pushed 2 bugfixes for LTTng to stable-1.1 on September 7th.
>>>> I was hoping that these fixes would be included in the release. Please
>>>> let me know.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Bernd
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Jeff Johnston<jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure, as discussed, if I can make it work without causing an update
>>>>> issue
>>>>> from SR0 to SR1.
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Jeff J.
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Aleksandar Kurtakov"<akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"<linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2012 4:12:52 AM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Juno SR1 Release
>>>>>
>>>>> Having 1.1.1 released for just this change and submitted as our SR1
>>>>> contribution sounds like the right thing to do?
>>>>> Jeff, do you want to do it ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Alex
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: "Andrew Overholt"<overholt@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"<linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2012 1:23:40 AM
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Juno SR1 Release
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I personally have a patch to add a C-only version of the ChangeLog
>>>>>>> feature which could be used by the SR! CPP EPP package so as not
>>>>>>> to drag in any JDT stuff.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This seems very important to me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Andrew
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> linuxtools-dev mailing list
>>>>>> linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> linuxtools-dev mailing list
>>>>> linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> linuxtools-dev mailing list
>>>>> linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> linuxtools-dev mailing list
>>>> linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> linuxtools-dev mailing list
>>> linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linuxtools-dev mailing list
>> linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linuxtools-dev mailing list
> linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev


Back to the top