Re: [linuxtools-dev] Juno SR1 Release

[Bernd Hufmann <bhufmann@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Jeff

The fixes are not crucial. They are more for a special setup and
condition. If you're not able to include it today for RC3, then I'm ok
to not include it for RC4/SR1. Just to be on the save side.

Linux Tools 1.2 is also coming in November and then we'll have the fixes in.

Thanks
Bernd


On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The system is not automated.  I test aggregation and then make that the
> stable build.  We are in RC3 now and should be stabilizing.
>
> What bug fixes did you make?  Are they crucial?  Today is +3 aggregation day
> and
> I can't seem to log into build.eclipse.org.  There is a chance I can get it
> in today, but I am not having success in logging into build.eclipse.org and
> staying logged in.
>
> Next week is the last aggregation build.  If we fail aggregation then we are
> in big trouble so if I can't get your stuff in today, you will have to
> justify the changes are crucial for RC4.  Note that the RC4 build will
> become 1.1.1.
>
> Don't forget that users can still get fixes via updates-nightly-juno after
> SR1 is released.
>
> -- Jeff J.
>
>
> On 09/12/2012 12:51 PM, Bernd Hufmann wrote:
>>
>> Hello
>>
>> Which build are we planning to use for SR1 RC4? I'm asking that
>> because RC3 was build and labelled on Hudson on September 6th.
>> However, I pushed 2 bugfixes for LTTng to stable-1.1 on September 7th.
>> I was hoping that these fixes would be included in the release. Please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Bernd
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Jeff Johnston<jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Sure, as discussed, if I can make it work without causing an update issue
>>> from SR0 to SR1.
>>>
>>> -- Jeff J.
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Aleksandar Kurtakov"<akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"<linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2012 4:12:52 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Juno SR1 Release
>>>
>>> Having 1.1.1 released for just this change and submitted as our SR1
>>> contribution sounds like the right thing to do?
>>> Jeff, do you want to do it ?
>>>
>>> Alex
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>
>>>> From: "Andrew Overholt"<overholt@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"<linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2012 1:23:40 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Juno SR1 Release
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I personally have a patch to add a C-only version of the ChangeLog
>>>>> feature which could be used by the SR! CPP EPP package so as not
>>>>> to drag in any JDT stuff.
>>>>
>>>> This seems very important to me.
>>>>
>>>> Andrew
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> linuxtools-dev mailing list
>>>> linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> linuxtools-dev mailing list
>>> linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> linuxtools-dev mailing list
>>> linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linuxtools-dev mailing list
>> linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linuxtools-dev mailing list
> linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev