[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [linuxtools-dev] Juno SR1 Release
|
Hello
Which build are we planning to use for SR1 RC4? I'm asking that
because RC3 was build and labelled on Hudson on September 6th.
However, I pushed 2 bugfixes for LTTng to stable-1.1 on September 7th.
I was hoping that these fixes would be included in the release. Please
let me know.
Thanks
Bernd
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Sure, as discussed, if I can make it work without causing an update issue from SR0 to SR1.
>
> -- Jeff J.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Aleksandar Kurtakov" <akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions" <linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2012 4:12:52 AM
> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Juno SR1 Release
>
> Having 1.1.1 released for just this change and submitted as our SR1 contribution sounds like the right thing to do?
> Jeff, do you want to do it ?
>
> Alex
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Andrew Overholt" <overholt@xxxxxxxxx>
>> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions" <linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2012 1:23:40 AM
>> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Juno SR1 Release
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > I personally have a patch to add a C-only version of the ChangeLog
>> > feature which could be used by the SR! CPP EPP package so as not
>> > to drag in any JDT stuff.
>>
>> This seems very important to me.
>>
>> Andrew
>> _______________________________________________
>> linuxtools-dev mailing list
>> linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> linuxtools-dev mailing list
> linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
> _______________________________________________
> linuxtools-dev mailing list
> linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
