[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [linuxtools-dev] Juno SR1 Release
|
I managed to update the build. I broke the then on-going Hudson build
by fiddling with the contents of the Linux Tools SR1 repo at the same
time, but the following build with my change just went through successfully.
-- Jeff J.
On 09/12/2012 01:51 PM, Bernd Hufmann wrote:
Hi Jeff
The fixes are not crucial. They are more for a special setup and
condition. If you're not able to include it today for RC3, then I'm ok
to not include it for RC4/SR1. Just to be on the save side.
Linux Tools 1.2 is also coming in November and then we'll have the fixes in.
Thanks
Bernd
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Jeff Johnston<jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The system is not automated. I test aggregation and then make that the
stable build. We are in RC3 now and should be stabilizing.
What bug fixes did you make? Are they crucial? Today is +3 aggregation day
and
I can't seem to log into build.eclipse.org. There is a chance I can get it
in today, but I am not having success in logging into build.eclipse.org and
staying logged in.
Next week is the last aggregation build. If we fail aggregation then we are
in big trouble so if I can't get your stuff in today, you will have to
justify the changes are crucial for RC4. Note that the RC4 build will
become 1.1.1.
Don't forget that users can still get fixes via updates-nightly-juno after
SR1 is released.
-- Jeff J.
On 09/12/2012 12:51 PM, Bernd Hufmann wrote:
Hello
Which build are we planning to use for SR1 RC4? I'm asking that
because RC3 was build and labelled on Hudson on September 6th.
However, I pushed 2 bugfixes for LTTng to stable-1.1 on September 7th.
I was hoping that these fixes would be included in the release. Please
let me know.
Thanks
Bernd
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Jeff Johnston<jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Sure, as discussed, if I can make it work without causing an update issue
from SR0 to SR1.
-- Jeff J.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Aleksandar Kurtakov"<akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"<linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2012 4:12:52 AM
Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Juno SR1 Release
Having 1.1.1 released for just this change and submitted as our SR1
contribution sounds like the right thing to do?
Jeff, do you want to do it ?
Alex
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Overholt"<overholt@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"<linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2012 1:23:40 AM
Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Juno SR1 Release
I personally have a patch to add a C-only version of the ChangeLog
feature which could be used by the SR! CPP EPP package so as not
to drag in any JDT stuff.
This seems very important to me.
Andrew
_______________________________________________
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
_______________________________________________
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
_______________________________________________
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
_______________________________________________
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
_______________________________________________
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
_______________________________________________
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
