Re: [jetty-dev] Re: jetty7 distribution

[Jesse McConnell <jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx>]

How about making a jetty/trunk/jetty-distribution parent and a
jetty/trunk/jetty-integration parent?

then terracotta and all of those guys build under their respective slots?

>  jetty-debian
>  jetty-rpm
>  jetty-maven-plugin
>  jetty-runner
>  jetty-hightide
>
>
> Looking at it this way, the jetty-hightide name makes more
> sense, since calling it jetty-distribution would crowd out
> those other as "distributions".
>
> Note, for jetty-6 hightide was different because it was patched and
> compiled differently.   For jetty-7 the artefacts that will be
> in hightide will just be the standard ones from maven.
>
>
>> * henceforth all rpm, deb, tar.gz distro's for jetty7 would come from
>> here, jetty6 we keep it the way it is and cleanup the hightide build
>> bits
>
> All the rpm, debs, tar.gz distros come from jetty@codehaus trunk
>
>
>> I would also like to suggest that we move anything jetty7 producing
>> into jetty/hightide/trunk and move the jetty6 branch back onto
>> jetty/trunk so its clear that is where jetty6 lives and we remain in
>> maintenance mode...that way it is clear that jetty7 is from eclipse
>> except for hightide bits and jetty6 is from codehaus svn...At the same
>> time we retire hightide-jetty6 since we haven't updated that recently
>> either..unless we have someone that needs it then it is a branch of
>> the above hightide location.
>>
>> Basically I want to get us down to as few active svn trunks and
>> branches as possible.
>
> Ditto!
>
> Going forward I want just to have
>
>  http://dev.eclipse.org/svnroot/rt/org.eclipse.jetty/jetty/trunk
>  http://svn.codehaus.org/jetty/jetty/trunk
>
>
> But until EoL we have to maintain jetty-6 and hightide-6 in
>  http://svn.codehaus.org/jetty/jetty/branches/jetty-6.1
>  http://svn.codehaus.org/jetty/hightide/trunk
>
>
>> Greg, some time ago you mentioned having a weekly or fortnightly
>> either phone or irc meeting...perhaps we could set something like that
>> up to discuss this?
>
> This is a good idea and we should definitely do this... I'll separately
> post with a suggestion for a regular time.
>
> But meanwhile, I want to get 7RC3 out.   We have built the eclipse
> project, but there is no runnable distro yet.     I could build
> jetty@codehaus, but that currently has jetty-distribution as the
> module name.    If we can get some agreement now, then I'd like
> to rename that jetty-hightide for the 7RC3 build from codehaus
> and this could be ready to run Monday!
>
>
>
> cheers
>
> _______________________________________________
> jetty-dev mailing list
> jetty-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-dev
>