I have available some time this week to
implement some enhancements, but now I'm not sure about priority, I got the
impression that most of us use FireFox; maybe it is better to improve FireFox
support first? There are some options for improvements I considered earlier:
- baseline changes: show changes (new, removed,
changed pages) after baseline update;
- upload of images and documents (this functionality was
lost with cleanup of code);
- and of course: update epf-dev mailing list with Wiki
changes;
Any other suggestions you might have we can consider too of course.
About the information we could extract: most of the information is
already in the (daily, weekly, monthly) change report; I copied the contents of
the report below as an example.
We could show for each Wiki: name and baseline, the contributed pages
and versions of pages and comments. For each page and version: title with link to
the page, version info and version note. For each comment: text (truncated to
50 chars?), link to comments, page and version info. For each contribution the user
(name and ID).
Other useful information might be the baseline changes (new, removed,
changed pages) in each weekly build of OpenUP.
[EPF
Wiki] Monthly Change Report - April 2007
Wiki
Sites
Site
|
Baseline
|
New
Versions
|
New
Comments
|
Checkouts
|
|
OpenUP
|
OpenUP_Basic_published-0.9-W-20070406
|
4 (from 4)
|
3 (from 3)
|
1
|
New!
|
XP
|
XP_published-0.1-20071601
|
0 (from 0)
|
0 (from 0)
|
0
|
New!
|
OpenUP PT
|
OUP_PT_20070403
|
22 (from 22)
|
0 (from 0)
|
1
|
New!
|
Scrum
|
SCRUM_20070410
|
0 (from 0)
|
0 (from 0)
|
0
|
New!
|
OpenUP RU
|
OUP_RU_20070410
|
0 (from 0)
|
0 (from 0)
|
0
|
New!
|
New
Versions
New
Comments
New
Users
Allan
Halme, takai, zalkind, Ronaldo Luiz, tom weinberger, Paulo Moreira, Calen
Legaspi, Aitor, hopeshared, Onno
Checkouts
Generated
on: Wed Apr 11 10:43:05 -0700 2007
Showing changes since: Mon Mar 12
10:43:05 -0700 2007
From:
epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ricardo Balduino
Sent: woensdag 4 april 2007 2:43
To: Eclipse Process Framework
Project Developers List
Subject: RE: [epf-dev] EPF Wiki
and contributing through a Wiki (epfwiki.net)
There's a separate thread I'm having with Eclipse legal on this very
topic. I'll post to this list when I get an answer from them.
Thanks,
Ricardo Balduino
Senior Software Engineer
IBM Rational Software (www.ibm.com/rational)
Eclipse Process Framework (www.eclipse.org/epf)
Jim Ruehlin/Irvine/IBM@IBMUS
Sent
by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
04/03/2007
05:00 PM
Please respond
to
Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List
<epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
To
|
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
cc
|
|
Subject
|
RE: [epf-dev] EPF Wiki and contributing through a Wiki
(epfwiki.net)
|
|
I agree Onno, this is a great idea. Should we
have a meeting to figure out the process by which the contributions and
comments would work before we check with Eclipse legal? Or can we reference the
wiki in epf-dev and newsgroup threads?
BTW, the RSS feed for wiki changes is a great feature too!
Thanks,
Jim
____________________
Jim Ruehlin, IBM Rational
RUP Content Developer
Eclipse Process Framework (EPF)
Committer www.eclipse.org/epf
email: jruehlin@xxxxxxxxxx
phone: 760.505.3232
fax: 949.369.0720
From:
epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ricardo Balduino/Cupertino/IBM
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 1:51 PM
To: epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [epf-dev] EPF Wiki and contributing through a Wiki
(epfwiki.net)
Onno,
I think it is a great idea to periodically send an automatic message to epf-dev
with a summary of what has been contributed to the Wiki. We'd need to clear
with Eclipse legal that this approach works though.
I'd say we start with weekly reports, so we have a sense of the volume of
contributions.
What information could we automatically extract? It would be interesting to see
in this report, as a minimum:
- Web site name and version
- list of pages contributed/changed,
- list of contributors
- name or user ID
- date of contribution
- material contributed (this may be too much, a link
to the Wiki page may be more feasible)
- any other information?
Thanks,
Ricardo Balduino
Senior Software Engineer
IBM Rational Software (www.ibm.com/rational)
Eclipse Process Framework (www.eclipse.org/epf)
"Straaten, Onno van der"
<onno.van.der.straaten@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
04/03/2007
01:40 AM
Please respond
to
Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List
<epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
To
|
<epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
|
[epf-dev] EPF Wiki and contributing through a Wiki
(epfwiki.net)
|
|
Hi group,
Last week I created a new site http://epfwiki.net with the
Wiki technology that was donated by LogicaCMG and that is currently under
Eclipse Legal Review. The trigger for creating this site is the translation
effort, but of course it can also host regular weekly builds of published sites
that can be downloaded from http://www.eclipse.org/epf. I like to
consider this site an unofficial EPF community site, sponsored by LogicaCMG,
created using software that will eventually be EPF software, after a positive
Eclipse Legal Review.
There is also a demo site http://demo.epfwiki.net with a demo
account demo@xxxxxxxxxxx with
password demo where you can try
out this technology.
An interesting was raised by Ricardo while we were discussing use of it for the
translation effort: how Wikis can be accepted as a means of contributing as
expected by the Eclipse organization. Of course this is an unofficial site but
it would be nice if contributions made there would also be recognized by the
Eclipse organization, similar to Bugzilla and the official discussions lists.
I think there are a number of approaches to this interesting issue. I like to
present what I think is a pragmatic approach: send every Wiki contribution to
the epf-dev mailing list. We could do this real-time or send a daily, weekly or
even monthly report. Do you think this is a viable option, good approach? If we
think it is, I like to ask the committers to make a decision on it and maybe
put it to a vote?
Best Regards,
Onno
Onno van der Straaten
Consultant
_________________________________________
LogicaCMG
P.O. Box 187
The Netherlands
T: +31 (0)70 30 29 302
M: +31 (0)6 481 03 483
www.logicacmg.com
This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use
by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material,
confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be
copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an
intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment
and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you._______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
|