[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [epf-dev] EPF Wiki and contributing through a Wiki (epfwiki.net)
|
There's a separate thread I'm having
with Eclipse legal on this very topic. I'll post to this list when I get
an answer from them.
Thanks,
Ricardo Balduino
Senior Software Engineer
IBM Rational Software (www.ibm.com/rational)
Eclipse Process Framework (www.eclipse.org/epf)
Jim Ruehlin/Irvine/IBM@IBMUS
Sent by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
04/03/2007 05:00 PM
|
Please respond to
Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List
<epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
|
To
| epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| RE: [epf-dev] EPF Wiki and contributing
through a Wiki (epfwiki.net) |
|
I agree Onno, this is a great
idea. Should we have a meeting to figure out the process by which the contributions
and comments would work before we check with Eclipse legal? Or can we reference
the wiki in epf-dev and newsgroup threads?
BTW, the RSS feed for wiki
changes is a great feature too!
Thanks,
Jim
____________________
Jim Ruehlin, IBM Rational
RUP Content Developer
Eclipse Process Framework
(EPF) Committer www.eclipse.org/epf
email: jruehlin@xxxxxxxxxx
phone: 760.505.3232
fax: 949.369.0720
From: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ricardo Balduino/Cupertino/IBM
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 1:51 PM
To: epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [epf-dev] EPF Wiki and contributing through a Wiki (epfwiki.net)
Onno,
I think it is a great idea to periodically send an automatic message to
epf-dev with a summary of what has been contributed to the Wiki. We'd need
to clear with Eclipse legal that this approach works though.
I'd say we start with weekly reports, so we have a sense of the volume
of contributions.
What information could we automatically extract? It would be interesting
to see in this report, as a minimum:
- Web site name and version
- list of pages contributed/changed,
- list of contributors
- name or user ID
- date of contribution
- material contributed (this may be too much,
a link to the Wiki page may be more feasible)
- any other information?
Thanks,
Ricardo Balduino
Senior Software Engineer
IBM Rational Software (www.ibm.com/rational)
Eclipse Process Framework (www.eclipse.org/epf)
"Straaten, Onno van
der" <onno.van.der.straaten@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
04/03/2007 01:40 AM
|
Please respond to
Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List
<epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
|
To
| <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| [epf-dev] EPF Wiki and contributing
through a Wiki (epfwiki.net) |
|
Hi group,
Last week I created a new site http://epfwiki.net
with the Wiki technology that was donated by LogicaCMG and that is currently
under Eclipse Legal Review. The trigger for creating this site is the translation
effort, but of course it can also host regular weekly builds of published
sites that can be downloaded from http://www.eclipse.org/epf.
I like to consider this site an unofficial EPF community site, sponsored
by LogicaCMG, created using software that will eventually be EPF software,
after a positive Eclipse Legal Review.
There is also a demo site http://demo.epfwiki.net
with a demo account demo@xxxxxxxxxxx
with password demo where you can try out this technology.
An interesting was raised by Ricardo while we were discussing use of it
for the translation effort: how Wikis can be accepted as a means of contributing
as expected by the Eclipse organization. Of course this is an unofficial
site but it would be nice if contributions made there would also be recognized
by the Eclipse organization, similar to Bugzilla and the official discussions
lists.
I think there are a number of approaches to this interesting issue. I like
to present what I think is a pragmatic approach: send every Wiki contribution
to the epf-dev mailing list. We could do this real-time or send a daily,
weekly or even monthly report. Do you think this is a viable option, good
approach? If we think it is, I like to ask the committers to make a decision
on it and maybe put it to a vote?
Best Regards,
Onno
Onno van der Straaten
Consultant
_________________________________________
LogicaCMG
P.O. Box 187
The Netherlands
T: +31 (0)70 30 29 302
M: +31 (0)6 481 03 483
www.logicacmg.com
This e-mail and any attachment is
for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary
material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege.
It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party.
If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail
and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you._______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
