| RE: [epf-dev] EPF Wiki and contributing through a Wiki (epfwiki.net) |
| "Straaten, Onno van
der" <onno.van.der.straaten@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 04/11/2007 11:28 PM
|
|
[EPF Wiki] Monthly Change
Report - April 2007
Wiki Sites
|
Site
|
Baseline
|
New Versions
|
New Comments
|
Checkouts
|
|
| OpenUP | OpenUP_Basic_published-0.9-W-20070406 |
4 (from 4)
|
3 (from 3)
|
1
|
New!
|
| XP | XP_published-0.1-20071601 |
0 (from 0)
|
0 (from 0)
|
0
|
New!
|
| OpenUP PT | OUP_PT_20070403 |
22 (from 22)
|
0 (from 0)
|
1
|
New!
|
| Scrum | SCRUM_20070410 |
0 (from 0)
|
0 (from 0)
|
0
|
New!
|
| OpenUP RU | OUP_RU_20070410 |
0 (from 0)
|
0 (from 0)
|
0
|
New! |
New Versions
| Page |
Version
|
Note
|
Site
|
Created
|
| Glossário de Tradução | Version 5 | Adding more content | OpenUP PT | about 4 hours ago by Paulo Moreira |
| Concept: Collaborate to align interests and share understanding | Version 2 | terminado | OpenUP PT | about 4 hours ago by takai |
| Task: Plan Iteration | Version 1 | Resolution of BUG 170803 | OpenUP | about 19 hours ago by Ana Paula Valente Pereira |
| Concept: Collaborate to align interests and share understanding | Version 1 | Tradução parcial. | OpenUP PT | about 20 hours ago by takai |
| Concept: Balance competing priorities to maximize stakeholder value | Version 2 | Acerto da formatação | OpenUP PT | about 20 hours ago by takai |
| Concept: Balance competing priorities to maximize stakeholder value | Version 1 | OpenUP PT | about 23 hours ago by takai | |
| Custom Category | Version 4 | Correção: alinhas para alinhar. | OpenUP PT | 1 day ago by takai |
| Guideline: Minimal, Complete, and Extensible | Version 2 | OpenUP PT | 1 day ago by takai | |
| Guideline: Minimal, Complete, and Extensible | Version 1 | OpenUP PT | 1 day ago by takai | |
| Guideline: OpenUP and OpenUP/Basic | Version 1 | OpenUP PT | 1 day ago by takai | |
| Custom Category | Version 3 | OpenUP PT | 1 day ago by takai | |
| Custom Category | Version 2 | OpenUP PT | 1 day ago by takai | |
| Custom Category | Version 1 | OpenUP PT | 1 day ago by takai | |
| Glossário de Tradução | Version 4 | OpenUP PT | 1 day ago by takai | |
| Glossário de Tradução | Version 3 | Including some terms | OpenUP PT | 1 day ago by Paulo Moreira |
| Custom Category | Version 6 | Added link to Translation Glossary to top of intro page for easy access. Remove link when we are done with translation, but save page somewhere else. | OpenUP PT | 1 day ago by Ricardo Balduino |
| Glossário de Tradução | Version 2 | OpenUP PT | 1 day ago by Ricardo Balduino | |
| Glossário de Tradução | Version 1 | Translation glossary created to help translation process. | OpenUP PT | 1 day ago by Ricardo Balduino |
| Custom Category | Version 5 | Link added at the bottom of the page didn't work. Making it plain text, so we remember to add the link later. | OpenUP PT | 1 day ago by Ricardo Balduino |
| Custom Category | Version 4 | Mudei acentuação e acrescentei um link no final to texto, que foi já adicionado ao OpenUP/Basic original | OpenUP PT | 1 day ago by Ricardo Balduino |
| Discipline: Architecture | Version 1 | OpenUP | 1 day ago by Jim Ruehlin | |
| Guideline: Software Reuse | Version 1 | OpenUP | 1 day ago by Jim Ruehlin | |
| Custom Category | Version 3 | pequena correção: de balanciar para balancear | OpenUP PT | 5 days ago by zalkind |
| Custom Category | Version 2 | Some minor changes after review | OpenUP PT | 5 days ago by Paulo Moreira |
| Custom Category | Version 1 | First translation to Portuguese | OpenUP PT | 6 days ago by Paulo Moreira |
| Role: Developer | Version 1 | I changed the brief description and added a link to the test case in the modifies area. | OpenUP | 13 days ago by Brian Lyons |
New Comments
| Comment |
Page
|
Site
|
Created
|
| I wonder if we want to say ... | Role: Developer | OpenUP | 6 days ago by Jim Ruehlin |
| This discipline has changed... | Discipline: Implementation | OpenUP | 13 days ago by Jim Ruehlin |
| This discipline has changed... | Discipline: Analysis & Design | OpenUP | 13 days ago by Jim Ruehlin |
New Users
Allan Halme, takai, zalkind, Ronaldo Luiz, tom weinberger, Paulo Moreira, Calen Legaspi, Aitor, hopeshared, Onno
Checkouts
| Page |
Version
|
Site
|
Created
|
| Guideline: Minimal, Complete, and Extensible | Version 2 | OpenUP PT | 1 day ago by takai |
| Task: Plan Iteration | Version 1 | OpenUP | about 19 hours ago by Ana Paula Valente Pereira |
Generated on: Wed Apr 11 10:43:05
-0700 2007
Showing changes since: Mon Mar 12 10:43:05 -0700 2007
| Jim Ruehlin/Irvine/IBM@IBMUS
Sent by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 04/03/2007 05:00 PM
|
|
| "Straaten, Onno van der"
<onno.van.der.straaten@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 04/03/2007 01:40 AM
|
|
Hi group,
Last week I created a new site http://epfwiki.net
with the Wiki technology that was donated by LogicaCMG and that is currently
under Eclipse Legal Review. The trigger for creating this site is the translation
effort, but of course it can also host regular weekly builds of published
sites that can be downloaded from http://www.eclipse.org/epf.
I like to consider this site an unofficial EPF community site, sponsored
by LogicaCMG, created using software that will eventually be EPF software,
after a positive Eclipse Legal Review.
There is also a demo site http://demo.epfwiki.net
with a demo account demo@xxxxxxxxxxx
with password demo where you can try out this technology.
An interesting was raised by Ricardo while we were discussing use of it
for the translation effort: how Wikis can be accepted as a means of contributing
as expected by the Eclipse organization. Of course this is an unofficial
site but it would be nice if contributions made there would also be recognized
by the Eclipse organization, similar to Bugzilla and the official discussions
lists.
I think there are a number of approaches to this interesting issue. I like
to present what I think is a pragmatic approach: send every Wiki contribution
to the epf-dev mailing list. We could do this real-time or send a daily,
weekly or even monthly report. Do you think this is a viable option, good
approach? If we think it is, I like to ask the committers to make a decision
on it and maybe put it to a vote?
Best Regards,
Onno
Onno van der Straaten
Consultant
_________________________________________
LogicaCMG
P.O. Box 187
The Netherlands
T: +31 (0)70 30 29 302
M: +31 (0)6 481 03 483
www.logicacmg.com
This e-mail and any attachment is
for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary
material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege.
It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party.
If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail
and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you._______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev