epf-dev Archive (Thread View - Most Recent First)

• Main Index

[First Page]    [Prev Page][Next Page]    [Last Page]

---

• RE: [epf-dev] Resolved PM status assessment items, (continued)
  • RE: [epf-dev] Resolved PM status assessment items, Chris Sibbald
• [epf-dev] RE: Database Design content in OpenUP, Brian Lyons
  • RE: [epf-dev] RE: Database Design content in OpenUP, Steve Adolph
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [epf-dev] RE: Database Design content in OpenUP, Mark . Dickson
• [epf-dev] Database Design content in OpenUP, Mark . Dickson
  • Re: [epf-dev] Database Design content in OpenUP, Ana Valente Pereira
  • Re: [epf-dev] Database Design content in OpenUP, Per Kroll
• [epf-dev] Very effective report for bug tracking, Per Kroll
• [epf-dev] PM Content - Capability Patterns, Per Kroll
  • Re: [epf-dev] PM Content - Capability Patterns, Ana Valente Pereira
    • RE: [epf-dev] PM Content - Capability Patterns, VAIDYA Kirti
      • RE: [epf-dev] PM Content - Capability Patterns, Peter Haumer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [epf-dev] PM Content - Capability Patterns, Brian Lyons
    • Re: [epf-dev] PM Content - Capability Patterns, Ana Valente Pereira
      • Re: [epf-dev] PM Content - Capability Patterns, Peter Haumer
      • Re: [epf-dev] PM Content - Capability Patterns, Ana Valente Pereira
  • RE: [epf-dev] PM Content - Capability Patterns, Jim Ruehlin
• [epf-dev] 156378: No point listing all roles in steps when entire team involved in task, Per Kroll
• [epf-dev] M5 - Show In Library View problem, itsme213
• [epf-dev] Reusing artifacts - question, itsme213
  • Re: [epf-dev] Reusing artifacts - question, Peter Haumer
    • Re: [epf-dev] Reusing artifacts - question, itsme213
      • Re: [epf-dev] Reusing artifacts - question, Peter Haumer
      • Re: [epf-dev] Reusing artifacts - question, itsme213
• [epf-dev] Upgrade a method plug-in from EPF M2 to EPF M5, Aitor Bediaga
  • Re: [epf-dev] Upgrade a method plug-in from EPF M2 to EPF M5, Ricardo Balduino
• [epf-dev] General and Overarching issues conference call agenda, Steve Adolph
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [epf-dev] General and Overarching issues conference call agenda, Steve Adolph
• [epf-dev] UPDATED: EPF Composer 1.0 M5 Milestone build is available, Jao Y Tham
• [epf-dev] Any examples / tutorial, itsme213
  • Re: [epf-dev] Any examples / tutorial, Peter Haumer
    • RE: [epf-dev] Any examples / tutorial, Steve Adolph
      • Re: [epf-dev] Any examples / tutorial, itsme213
      • [epf-dev] Intro page, Bruce Macisaac
      • Re: [epf-dev] Intro page + Plus comments for all content leads++, Per Kroll
      • Re: [epf-dev] Intro page + Plus comments for all content leads++, Russell Pannone
      • Re: [epf-dev] Intro page + Plus comments for all content leads++, Jochen Krebs
      • Re: [epf-dev] Intro page + Plus comments for all content leads++, Ana Valente Pereira
      • Re: [epf-dev] Intro page + Plus comments for all content leads++, Bruce Macisaac
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Re: [epf-dev] Any examples / tutorial, MASARYK Ján
• [epf-dev] A bit of dissemination progress, Cees Michielsen
• [epf-dev] General - Write text for Delivery Process and Capability Patterns (Phases), Ricardo Balduino
• [epf-dev] PM Capability Pattern "Initiate Project" for review, Jochen Krebs
• [epf-dev] Need First Review of Checklist: Design, Jim Ruehlin
  • Re: [epf-dev] Need First Review of Checklist: Design, Scott W. Ambler
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [epf-dev] Need First Review of Checklist: Design, Jim Ruehlin
  • RE: [epf-dev] Need First Review of Checklist: Design, Jim Ruehlin
• [epf-dev] term definition, Jochen Krebs
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [epf-dev] term definition, VAIDYA Kirti
    • Re: [epf-dev] term definition, Ricardo Balduino
  • RE: [epf-dev] term definition, Nate Oster
• [epf-dev] PM Content Review, Jochen Krebs
• [epf-dev] Next two PM calls, Chris Armstrong
• [epf-dev] Review of Developer Test Related content, Brian Lyons
• [epf-dev] EPF Composer 1.0 M5 Milestone build is available, Jao Y Tham
• [epf-dev] Bugzilla Issue 150767, Steve Adolph
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [epf-dev] Bugzilla Issue 150767, Jim Ruehlin
    • RE: [epf-dev] Bugzilla Issue 150767, Steve Adolph
      • RE: [epf-dev] Bugzilla Issue 150767, Ricardo Balduino
      • RE: [epf-dev] Bugzilla Issue 150767, Steve Adolph
• [epf-dev] Content leads, pls change status of these bugs, Per Kroll
• [epf-dev] EPF API Questions, Rajesh Jain
  • Re: [epf-dev] EPF API Questions, Kelvin Low
    • Re: [epf-dev] EPF API Questions, Rajesh Jain
      • Re: [epf-dev] EPF API Questions, Kelvin Low
• RE: [epf-dev] EPF 1.0 review slides and Project log, Chris Sibbald
• RE: [epf-dev] Review comments? Or forever hold your peace - at leastuntil the next release of OpenUP, Chris Sibbald
• [epf-dev] NEW TIME Review of key Development content, Brian Lyons
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [epf-dev] NEW TIME Review of key Development content, Chris Sibbald
  • RE: [epf-dev] NEW TIME Review of key Development content, Jim Ruehlin
• [epf-dev] Review comments? Or forever hold your peace - at least until the next release of OpenUP, Steve Adolph
  • Re: [epf-dev] Review comments? Or forever hold your peace - at leastuntil the next release of OpenUP, Scott W. Ambler
• [epf-dev] Eclipse Process Framework Question, jsmith
  • Re: [epf-dev] Eclipse Process Framework Question, Kelvin Low
    • Re: [epf-dev] Eclipse Process Framework Question, Charles Yan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Re: [epf-dev] Eclipse Process Framework Question, jsmith
  • RE: Re: [epf-dev] Eclipse Process Framework Question, jsmith
• [epf-dev] WAS: OpenUP Graphics => OpenUP distilled into 9 slides, Per Kroll
  • Re: [epf-dev] WAS: OpenUP Graphics => OpenUP distilled into 9 slides, Chris Sibbald
  • Re: [epf-dev] WAS: OpenUP Graphics => OpenUP distilled into 9 slides, Scott W. Ambler
  • Re: [epf-dev] WAS: OpenUP Graphics => OpenUP distilled into 9 slides, Ana Valente Pereira
    • Re: [epf-dev] WAS: OpenUP Graphics => OpenUP distilled into 9 slides, Ricardo Balduino
• [epf-dev] New version of OpenUP/Basic, Ricardo Balduino
• [epf-dev] merge or seperate PM guidelines, Jochen Krebs
  • Re: [epf-dev] merge or seperate PM guidelines, Scott W. Ambler
  • Re: [epf-dev] merge or seperate PM guidelines, Per Kroll
  • Re: [epf-dev] merge or separate PM guidelines, Ricardo Balduino
• [epf-dev] Test Content Review 11AM Pacific (2PM EST) today, Nate Oster
• [epf-dev] Pls let me know if your company will deliver services or build products leveraging EPF 1.0?, Per Kroll
• [epf-dev] Release review slides, Per Kroll
  • RE: [epf-dev] Release review slides, VAIDYA Kirti
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [epf-dev] Release review slides, Nate Oster
• [epf-dev] Who contributed to EPF 1.0, Per Kroll
  • Re: [epf-dev] Who contributed to EPF 1.0, Per Kroll
    • Re: [epf-dev] Who contributed to EPF 1.0, Charles Yan
      • RE: [epf-dev] Who contributed to EPF 1.0, Asier Azaceta
      • RE: [epf-dev] Who contributed to EPF 1.0, Charles Yan
      • [epf-dev] EPF 1.0 review slides and Project log, Per Kroll
      • Re: [epf-dev] EPF 1.0 review slides and Project log, Mark . Dickson
      • Re: [epf-dev] EPF 1.0 review slides and Project log => Leonardo Medeiros, Per Kroll

---

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.10