[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [epf-dev] Triage on bugs assigned to 1.0.0.
|
We may want to reconsider where to reassign those PM bugs. They both
involve creating new content. At the February committers meeting we
discussed trying not to add new content after M7 (C2), so we can use M8
(C3) for fixes and M9 (T1) for enablement.
We may want to reassess the decision to avoid adding new content, or
consider moving more content into the 1.0.1 release. Does anyone have an
opinion?
- Jim
____________________
Jim Ruehlin, IBM Rational
RUP Content Developer
Eclipse Process Framework (EPF) Committer www.eclipse.org/epf
email: jruehlin@xxxxxxxxxx
phone: 760.505.3232
fax: 949.369.0720
________________________________
From: Ana Valente Pereira <apereira@xxxxxxxxxxx> [mailto:Ana Valente
Pereira <apereira@xxxxxxxxxxx>]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 12:58 PM
To: Jim Ruehlin/Irvine/IBM
Cc: Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List
Subject: Re: [epf-dev] Triage on bugs assigned to 1.0.0.
According to the plan I sent today I would like to propose moving
146476 to M8 and 171122 to M9 (together with other XP content bugs)
thanks
Ana
>Move to M7 (C2)
>
>PM
>
>https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=146476
>
>https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=171122
>
>
>
>
