[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [cdt-dev] CDT 7.0 RC4 Candidate Available
|
We probably should at all stages, IMO. Quality over quantity. The
high level of scrutiny in the DSF and DSF-GDB plugins has produced
high quality, highly-understandable code, and I have no doubt we are
getting things done right the first time more often because of it. I
keep hearing about parts of CDT that are very hard to decipher and
maintain. That sort of situation can only come about because
developers commit features and enhancements without any critical
oversight. I for one would like to hear people diving into our
codebase rave about how great it is. I'm always impressed when I look
at platform code. It's clean, it's well thought out, and it's well
documented. That's no surprise; every change is carefully reviewed. I
don't known why we're not holding ourselves to the same standards.
John
At 01:34 PM 6/4/2010, Doug Schaefer wrote:
People on the commercial side of my life have been asking about
whether we do code reviews and such. We probably should, at least at
this stage of the cycle.
