[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [buckminster-dev] Buckminster headless usage - Binary ?
|
Yes, Thomas, I installed complete buckminster as hedless and optional part contained in update site, but strange, that I do not have buckminster.bat at the root of eclipse installation, now If try to try again, I get a message saying that "No feature found on selected sites".
Regards.
Ravi.
On 1/3/07, Thomas Hallgren <thomas@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Ravi Roy wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
> Buckminster not being and "EXE" or "BAT" or any known executable
> extension to system gives :
> "'buckminster is not recognised as internal or external command"
Did you install the headless buckminster product? If you did, you should
indeed have a buckminster.bat
file at the root of the installation. If
all you did was to install the buckminster features into your IDE using
the update manager, you will not get that script. The script is bundled
with the headless product, not with the features.
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
> As you earlier mentioned, Buckminster.exe have been replaced by
> calling eclipse's starup.jar by passing the script for calling
> commands wrapped in defined extension points provided by buckminster ?
> My usage scenario is building eclipse plugins headless.
> Thanks for your help.
> Regards,
> Ravi.
>
>
_______________________________________________
buckminster-dev mailing list
buckminster-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/buckminster-dev
