RE: [technology-pmc] Do we really need the SOC project?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

RE: [technology-pmc] Do we really need the SOC project?

From: "Mike Milinkovich" <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:34:03 -0400
Delivered-to: technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/technology-pmc>
List-help: <mailto:technology-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc>, <mailto:technology-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc>, <mailto:technology-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Eclipse Foundation, Inc.
Thread-index: AckrDBHkSADd8oqSS/KzMKuXiBFVcQAAi8pw

> I agree that an "Eclipse Incubator" would be a more appropriate name
> for the Technology Project given its charter as it stands right now.

Has the PMC read the charter[1] lately? 

Incubation is only one of the missions of the Technology PMC.

On a related note, it is likely time to have the charter re-vamped. It is
obviously aged :-)

[1] http://www.eclipse.org/technology/technology-charter.html

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [technology-pmc] Do we really need the SOC project?
  - From: Konstantin Komissarchik

References:
- [technology-pmc] Do we really need the SOC project?
  - From: Wayne Beaton
- Re: [technology-pmc] Do we really need the SOC project?
  - From: Gunnar Wagenknecht
- Re: [technology-pmc] Do we really need the SOC project?
  - From: Wayne Beaton
- RE: [technology-pmc] Do we really need the SOC project?
  - From: Konstantin Komissarchik

Prev by Date: RE: [technology-pmc] Nexus project
Next by Date: RE: [technology-pmc] Do we really need the SOC project?
Previous by thread: RE: [technology-pmc] Do we really need the SOC project?
Next by thread: RE: [technology-pmc] Do we really need the SOC project?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs