Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [ofmp-dev] Committer Election for Jan Blankenhorn

Hello!

Ok. Your point is clear. It's not a case when people are "assigned" to
project. It's a case when they have to "win" the right to work on
project. It's a bit strange, since in this specific case we really
"assign" person to a project, since we are a company and Jan works for
us.

So let's wait a bit, and I will work as a "proxy" for him, to access
cvs repository with web site. It will slightly inconvenient, but as I
can see it's a price of real meritocracy. :)


On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It's actually not at all strange.
>
> When Nathan was hired by the Eclipse Foundation to work as a web designer,
> he had to go through a process of becoming a committer on the Phoenix
> project. He started by making several contributions though bugzilla which
> existing committers reviewed and then committed on his behalf. After he
> established a trend of contributing high-quality patches and other
> contributions, he was nominated as a committer. The same is true for Gabe
> and Karl on various projects they commit on.
>
> Being a committer on an Eclipse project is all about merit. You have to
> demonstrate that you have the required credentials to be a committer before
> you can become one.
>
> Can you describe a little more about the work Jan did on the Victoria
> project? What functionality did he contribute? Is there some existing part
> of OFMP that you can cite as work Jan did?
>
> Wayne
>
> Aleksey Aristov wrote:
>>
>> Hello!
>>
>> If someone starts to work on a project, it's a bit strange to expect
>> any contributions, before he started. As I say, Jan is assigned to the
>> task, and I am sure he will do his job well.
>>
>> In addition, I can add that he already worked for Victoria project - a
>> closed source software which code base is a basis for initial part of
>> OFMP. His responsibility was to develop a test suite for integration
>> testing.
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I'll need a little more to work with before we can approve.
>>>
>>> What qualifications does Jan bring? Has Jan made any significant
>>> contributions to the project already?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Wayne
>>>
>>> Aleksey Aristov wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hello!
>>>>
>>>> Jan works for WeigleWilczek (one of the companies, behind OFMP). From
>>>> now on, Jan will be in charge of OFMP project web site. We have to
>>>> improve a lot there, so we will have a dedicated person for this job.
>>>>
>>>> /AAV
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you please provide some rationalization for the nomination of Jan
>>>>> Blankenhorn as committer.
>>>>>
>>>>> We need a little more than "New committer on project" or "yo!".
>>>>> Something
>>>>> like "Jan provided us with a great contribution (bug xxxx) and has
>>>>> agreed
>>>>> to
>>>>> come on board to support it" or "Jan is a giant in the field and our
>>>>> project
>>>>> will benefit greatly from the added wisdom and guidance"
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Wayne
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> ofmp-dev mailing list
>>>>> ofmp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ofmp-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ofmp-dev mailing list
>>> ofmp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ofmp-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ofmp-dev mailing list
> ofmp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ofmp-dev
>



-- 
Aleksey Aristov
----------------------------------------------------

CONFIDENTIALITY:  This email (including any attachments) may contain
confidential, proprietary and privileged information, and unauthorized
disclosure or use is prohibited.  If you received this email in error,
please notify the sender and delete this email from your system.
Thank you.


Back to the top