Re: [m2e-dev] new target milestones in bugzilla

[Wayne Beaton <emo@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

My mistake.

I mixed up "service release" with "bug fix release"

Whether or not new functionality can be added in Indigo SR1/SR2 is left
to the discretion of the planning council and the project leadership. In
the past this has been permitted.

A "bug fix release" in which the third-segment of the version is
increased does not require a review.

Any release that includes new functionality must undergo a review.

FWIW, I'm pretty sure that I'm not a member of the m2e-dev list. Can you
copy this message there, please?

HTH,

Wayne

On 06/28/2011 12:40 PM, David Carver wrote:
> According to Wayne, only bug fixes in a Service Release.
>
> So if you are contributing to SR1 and SR2, you can only contribute bug
> fixes, no new features or functionality.
>
> This doesn't stop you from releasing in 3 months, a 1.1.0 that
> contains new features, and bug fixes, but it does mean you'll have to
> have a maintenance branch, and a 1.1.x development branch.
>
> As a side note, bug fixes in a service release don't have to go
> through IP review or release process, if you do a 1.1.0 then that will
> need to go through the full release process.
>
>
> Dave
>
> On 06/28/2011 11:45 AM, Igor Fedorenko wrote:
>> I don't believe this is the case. To the best of my knowledge, we can
>> release m2e 1.1.0 in September with new features/etc, should we decide
>> this is necessary.
>>
>> Also, as I mentioned already, helping writing new m2e extensions is our
>> highest priority at the moment and we schedule our work accordingly.
>> We'll make selective bugfixes, but otherwise anything that does not help
>> writing m2e extensions will have to wait until there is enough
>> documentation, examples, fixes to the mapping logic and so on.
>>
>> -- 
>> Regards,
>> Igor
>>
>> On 11-06-28 7:23 PM, David Carver wrote:
>>> The only down fall to this approach is that it means in eclipse
>>> terminology no new Features or enhancements. Only bug fixes. Many of
>>> the
>>> requests I'm seeing on m2e-users are not necessarily bugs, but
>>> enhancement/feature requests.
>>>
>>> So in this case, any Enhancements or new functionality, would need
>>> to go
>>> into a new branch for Juno.
>>>
>>> Dave
>>>
>>> On 06/28/2011 09:14 AM, Igor Fedorenko wrote:
>>>> Cool. Created Indigo SR1/SR2 milestones.
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Igor
>>>>
>>>> On 11-06-28 5:07 PM, Milos Kleint wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jun 27, 2011, at 3:36 PM, Igor Fedorenko wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Guess my message came out little confusing. Let me try again
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to propose keeping single development stream both for
>>>>>> Indigo SR1 and Juno work and only do 100% backwards compatible
>>>>>> bugfixes
>>>>>> and enhancements. We'll use version
>>>>>> 1.0.100.qualifier/1.0.200.qualifier
>>>>>> in the code and "Indigo SR1"/"Indigo SR2" milestones in bugzilla.
>>>>>> Our
>>>>>> Juno contributions will be aligned with Indigo SR work and we'll
>>>>>> decide
>>>>>> what to do next after SR2 is out next February.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any concerns, comments, objections?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 on having the bugzilla names "Indigo SR1/Indigo SR2"
>>>>> Having just one stream sounds like a good idea too.. of course only
>>>>> until we find out we need 2 streams :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Milos
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Igor
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11-06-24 3:16 PM, Igor Fedorenko wrote:
>>>>>>> We need to decide on versions first.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As suggested by Pascal, SR1 version will be 1.0.100, so we have
>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>> room to deliver new maven runtimes and hotfixes off marketplace.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What version should we use for Juno? 1.1.0? Do we even want
>>>>>>> separate
>>>>>>> vesrions for Indigo sr1 and Juno?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- Sent from my SGS Milos Kleint<milos@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> hello,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> can someone add new target milestones for m2e in bugzilla? or
>>>>>>>>> instruct me how to do it myself? The current targets are only
>>>>>>>>> 0.13, we probably need some post 1.0.0 ones. I would suggest
>>>>>>>>> 1.0.1 and/or 1.1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Milos
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> m2e-dev mailing list
>>>>>> m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-dev
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> m2e-dev mailing list
>>>>> m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-dev
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> m2e-dev mailing list
>>>> m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-dev
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> m2e-dev mailing list
>>> m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> m2e-dev mailing list
>> m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-dev
>

-- 
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton