Re: [m2e-dev] new target milestones in bugzilla

[David Carver <d_a_carver@xxxxxxxxx>]

The only down fall to this approach is that it means in eclipse 
terminology no new Features or enhancements.  Only bug fixes.   Many of 
the requests I'm seeing on m2e-users are not necessarily bugs, but 
enhancement/feature requests.

So in this case, any Enhancements or new functionality, would need to go 
into a new branch for Juno.

Dave

On 06/28/2011 09:14 AM, Igor Fedorenko wrote:
> Cool. Created Indigo SR1/SR2 milestones.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Igor
>
> On 11-06-28 5:07 PM, Milos Kleint wrote:
> > On Jun 27, 2011, at 3:36 PM, Igor Fedorenko wrote:
> >
> > > Guess my message came out little confusing. Let me try again
> > >
> > > I would like to propose keeping single development stream both for
> > > Indigo SR1 and Juno work and only do 100% backwards compatible bugfixes
> > > and enhancements. We'll use version 1.0.100.qualifier/1.0.200.qualifier
> > > in the code and "Indigo SR1"/"Indigo SR2" milestones in bugzilla. Our
> > > Juno contributions will be aligned with Indigo SR work and we'll decide
> > > what to do next after SR2 is out next February.
> > >
> > > Any concerns, comments, objections?
> >
> >
> > +1 on having the bugzilla names "Indigo SR1/Indigo SR2"
> > Having just one stream sounds like a good idea too.. of course only 
> > until we find out we need 2 streams :)
> >
> > Milos
> >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Igor
> > >
> > > On 11-06-24 3:16 PM, Igor Fedorenko wrote:
> > > > We need to decide on versions first.
> > > >
> > > > As suggested by Pascal, SR1 version will be 1.0.100, so we have some
> > > > room to deliver new maven runtimes and hotfixes off marketplace.
> > > >
> > > > What version should we use for Juno? 1.1.0? Do we even want separate
> > > > vesrions for Indigo sr1 and Juno?
> > > >
> > > > -- Sent from my SGS Milos Kleint<milos@xxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
> > > > > > hello,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > can someone add new target milestones for m2e in bugzilla? or
> > > > > > instruct me how to do it myself? The current targets are only
> > > > > > 0.13, we probably need some post 1.0.0 ones. I would suggest
> > > > > > 1.0.1 and/or 1.1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Milos
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > m2e-dev mailing list
> > > m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > m2e-dev mailing list
> > m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-dev
> _______________________________________________
> m2e-dev mailing list
> m2e-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-dev