[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [epp-dev] EPP packages containing Incubating projects (IMPORTANT)
|
CPP has nothing in incubation. cdt.mylyn is part of the regular CDT.
Cheers,
Doug
> -----Original Message-----
> From: epp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:epp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Markus Knauer
> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 4:45 AM
> To: epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Bjorn Freeman-Benson; 'Janet Campbell'
> Subject: Re: [epp-dev] EPP packages containing Incubating
> projects (IMPORTANT)
>
> The long discussion about the naming and sort order of the
> packages on bug
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=224729 reminds
> me of an old
> issue: Including content from projects in incubation phase.
>
> When I wrote that email below (in February), it was based on
> the assumption that *all* bits included in the Ganymede
> packages are out of incubation, but as of today I am not sure
> any more.
>
> * Eclipse IDE for Java EE Developers
> @ David: No projects in incubation? Correct?
>
> * Eclipse Classic - fake package (Eclipse SDK)
>
> * Eclipse for RCP/Plug-in Developers = OKAY
>
> * Eclipse Modeling Tools
> @ Rich: I assume there are some projects still in incubation?
>
> * Eclipse IDE for Java Developers
> @ Mik: No projects in incubation? Correct?
>
> * Eclipse IDE for C/C++ Developers
> @ Doug: No projects in incubation? Correct? org.eclipse.cdt.mylyn?
>
> * Eclipse IDE for Java and Report Developers
> @ Xiaoying: No projects in incubation? Correct?
>
> @Bjorn, Janet: *If* there are features from a project in
> incubation phase included in a package, what do we have to
> do? Change the file name of the package, include it in the
> description at the web site, ... what else?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Markus
>
>
>
> On Wednesday 06 February 2008, Markus Knauer wrote:
> > > (1) Do any of the existing packages contain projects that are
> > > incubating or are shipping incubating code?
> >
> > Please find a list of all currently included features at the end of
> > this email.
> > Status: IMHO there are no features from incubation projects in the
> > projects with one exception: The EPP UDC code is in incubation, but
> > only included in the Ganymede packages.
> >
> > > (2) If so, when can you change the package build system
> to include
> > > the correct incubation phrase and to have the package
> name itself be
> > > "JavaEE (Incubation)" (or whatever).
> >
> > Europa Packages: They do not contain features from projects in
> > incubation phase. => No action required.
> >
> > Ganymede Packages: These are 'milestone' or nightly builds. They
> > contain at least something like "-M4-" in their name. AFAIK we can
> > have as much milestone builds as we need, but we have to
> ensure that
> > everything inside is out of incubation until the release. => Do we
> > need to change something until then?
> >
> > Other/future packages: Projects in the packages *should* have a
> > version
> > >=1.0 unless there are good reasons to include something newer. If
> > >this is
> > the case we should start describing naming conventions.
> >
> > Markus
> >
> >
> > %<
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----
> > "org.eclipse.cdt"
> > "org.eclipse.cvs"
> > "org.eclipse.datatools.connectivity.feature"
> > "org.eclipse.datatools.connectivity.oda.designer.feature"
> > "org.eclipse.datatools.connectivity.oda.feature"
> > "org.eclipse.datatools.doc.user"
> > "org.eclipse.datatools.enablement.apache.derby.feature"
> > "org.eclipse.datatools.enablement.feature"
> > "org.eclipse.datatools.enablement.hsqldb.feature"
> > "org.eclipse.datatools.enablement.ibm.feature"
> > "org.eclipse.datatools.enablement.jdbc.feature"
> > "org.eclipse.datatools.enablement.msft.feature"
> > "org.eclipse.datatools.enablement.mysql.feature"
> > "org.eclipse.datatools.enablement.oda.designer.feature"
> > "org.eclipse.datatools.enablement.oda.feature"
> > "org.eclipse.datatools.enablement.oracle.feature"
> > "org.eclipse.datatools.enablement.postgresql.feature"
> > "org.eclipse.datatools.enablement.sybase.feature"
> > "org.eclipse.datatools.modelbase.feature"
> > "org.eclipse.datatools.sqldevtools.data.feature"
> > "org.eclipse.datatools.sqldevtools.ddl.feature"
> > "org.eclipse.datatools.sqldevtools.feature"
> > "org.eclipse.datatools.sqldevtools.parsers.feature"
> > "org.eclipse.datatools.sqldevtools.results.feature"
> > "org.eclipse.emf"
> > "org.eclipse.emf.common"
> > "org.eclipse.emf.common.ui"
> > "org.eclipse.emf.ecore"
> > "org.eclipse.emf.ecore.edit"
> > "org.eclipse.emf.ecore.sdo"
> > "org.eclipse.emf.edit"
> > "org.eclipse.emf.edit.ui"
> > "org.eclipse.epp.usagedata.feature"
> > "org.eclipse.gef"
> > "org.eclipse.jdt"
> > "org.eclipse.jpt.feature"
> > "org.eclipse.jst"
> > "org.eclipse.mylyn.bugzilla_feature"
> > "org.eclipse.mylyn.context_feature"
> > "org.eclipse.mylyn_feature"
> > "org.eclipse.mylyn.ide_feature"
> > "org.eclipse.mylyn.java_feature"
> > "org.eclipse.mylyn.pde_feature"
> > "org.eclipse.pde"
> > "org.eclipse.platform"
> > "org.eclipse.sdk"
> > "org.eclipse.wst"
> > "org.eclipse.wst.common_ui.feature"
> > "org.eclipse.wst.xml_ui.feature"
> > "org.eclipse.xsd"
> > "org.eclipse.xsd.edit"
> > %<
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----
> >
> > On Sunday 03 February 2008, David M Williams wrote:
> > > The JEE packages does not, and has no plans to (since even an
> > > incubating project must have a pre 1.0 release review to
> be included ... right?).
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > P.S. I'm just responding so you'll know others do
> subscribe to this
> > > list
> > >
> > > :)
> > >
> > > From:
> > > Bjorn Freeman-Benson <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To:
> > > epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Cc:
> > > Bjorn Freeman-Benson <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Janet
> > > Campbell'" <janet.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Date:
> > > 02/01/2008 05:39 PM
> > > Subject:
> > > [epp-dev] EPP packages containing Incubating projects
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Packagers,
> > > Janet has alerted me to something I forgot about the packages:
> > > because they are a "distribution" by the Eclipse
> Foundation, we/you
> > > need to make sure that if the packages containing any Incubation
> > > Phase projects, the packages are correctly labeled as such. The
> > > standard for labeling is currently described in the
> incubation phase
> > > guidelines and includes having the file names contain
> "-incubation-". So, two questions:
> > >
> > > (1) Do any of the existing packages contain projects that are
> > > incubating or are shipping incubating code?
> > > (2) If so, when can you change the package build system
> to include
> > > the correct incubation phrase and to have the package
> name itself be
> > > "JavaEE (Incubation)" (or whatever).
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > - Bjorn
> > >
> > > -------- Original Message --------
> > > Subject:
> > > RE: FW: [eclipse.org-planning-council] EclipseCon and Ganymede M5
> > > Date:
> > > Fri, 1 Feb 2008 11:50:58 -0500
> > > From:
> > > Janet Campbell <janet.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Organization:
> > > Eclipse Foundation, Inc.
> > > To:
> > > 'Bjorn Freeman-Benson' <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > References:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > At a minimum, we should try to be consistent with the naming
> > > requirements for incubating projects. Including a notice file in
> > > the root directory indicating the status of the
> distribution would
> > > also help. What will the person accessing the file be
> presented with?
> > >
> > > Janet Campbell
> _______________________________________________
> epp-dev mailing list
> epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev
>
