Re: [epp-dev] EPP packages containing Incubating projects

[Markus Knauer <mknauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> (1) Do any of the existing packages contain projects that are incubating
> or are shipping incubating code?

Please find a list of all currently included features at the end of this 
email.
Status: IMHO there are no features from incubation projects in the projects 
with one exception: The EPP UDC code is in incubation, but only included in 
the Ganymede packages.

> (2) If so, when can you change the package build system to include the
> correct incubation phrase and to have the package name itself be "JavaEE
> (Incubation)" (or whatever).

Europa Packages: They do not contain features from projects in incubation 
phase. => No action required.

Ganymede Packages: These are 'milestone' or nightly builds. They contain at 
least something like "-M4-" in their name. AFAIK we can have as much 
milestone builds as we need, but we have to ensure that everything inside is 
out of incubation until the release. => Do we need to change something until 
then?

Other/future packages: Projects in the packages *should* have a version >=1.0 
unless there are good reasons to include something newer. If this is the case 
we should start describing naming conventions.

Markus


%< --------------------------------------------------------------------------
"org.eclipse.cdt"
"org.eclipse.cvs"
"org.eclipse.datatools.connectivity.feature"
"org.eclipse.datatools.connectivity.oda.designer.feature"
"org.eclipse.datatools.connectivity.oda.feature"
"org.eclipse.datatools.doc.user"
"org.eclipse.datatools.enablement.apache.derby.feature"
"org.eclipse.datatools.enablement.feature"
"org.eclipse.datatools.enablement.hsqldb.feature"
"org.eclipse.datatools.enablement.ibm.feature"
"org.eclipse.datatools.enablement.jdbc.feature"
"org.eclipse.datatools.enablement.msft.feature"
"org.eclipse.datatools.enablement.mysql.feature"
"org.eclipse.datatools.enablement.oda.designer.feature"
"org.eclipse.datatools.enablement.oda.feature"
"org.eclipse.datatools.enablement.oracle.feature"
"org.eclipse.datatools.enablement.postgresql.feature"
"org.eclipse.datatools.enablement.sybase.feature"
"org.eclipse.datatools.modelbase.feature"
"org.eclipse.datatools.sqldevtools.data.feature"
"org.eclipse.datatools.sqldevtools.ddl.feature"
"org.eclipse.datatools.sqldevtools.feature"
"org.eclipse.datatools.sqldevtools.parsers.feature"
"org.eclipse.datatools.sqldevtools.results.feature"
"org.eclipse.emf"
"org.eclipse.emf.common"
"org.eclipse.emf.common.ui"
"org.eclipse.emf.ecore"
"org.eclipse.emf.ecore.edit"
"org.eclipse.emf.ecore.sdo"
"org.eclipse.emf.edit"
"org.eclipse.emf.edit.ui"
"org.eclipse.epp.usagedata.feature"
"org.eclipse.gef"
"org.eclipse.jdt"
"org.eclipse.jpt.feature"
"org.eclipse.jst"
"org.eclipse.mylyn.bugzilla_feature"
"org.eclipse.mylyn.context_feature"
"org.eclipse.mylyn_feature"
"org.eclipse.mylyn.ide_feature"
"org.eclipse.mylyn.java_feature"
"org.eclipse.mylyn.pde_feature"
"org.eclipse.pde"
"org.eclipse.platform"
"org.eclipse.sdk"
"org.eclipse.wst"
"org.eclipse.wst.common_ui.feature"
"org.eclipse.wst.xml_ui.feature"
"org.eclipse.xsd"
"org.eclipse.xsd.edit"
%< --------------------------------------------------------------------------


On Sunday 03 February 2008, David M Williams wrote:
> The JEE packages does not, and has no plans to (since even an incubating
> project must have a pre 1.0 release review to be included ... right?).
>
> Thanks,
>
> P.S. I'm just responding so you'll know others do subscribe to this list
>
> :)
>
> From:
> Bjorn Freeman-Benson <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To:
> epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc:
> Bjorn Freeman-Benson <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Janet
> Campbell'" <janet.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:
> 02/01/2008 05:39 PM
> Subject:
> [epp-dev] EPP packages containing Incubating projects
>
>
>
> Packagers,
> Janet has alerted me to something I forgot about the packages: because
> they are a "distribution" by the Eclipse Foundation, we/you need to make
> sure that if the packages containing any Incubation Phase projects, the
> packages are correctly labeled as such. The standard for labeling is
> currently described in the incubation phase guidelines and includes having
> the file names contain "-incubation-".  So, two questions:
>
> (1) Do any of the existing packages contain projects that are incubating
> or are shipping incubating code?
> (2) If so, when can you change the package build system to include the
> correct incubation phrase and to have the package name itself be "JavaEE
> (Incubation)" (or whatever).
>
> Thanks,
> - Bjorn
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject:
> RE: FW: [eclipse.org-planning-council] EclipseCon and Ganymede M5
> Date:
> Fri, 1 Feb 2008 11:50:58 -0500
> From:
> Janet Campbell <janet.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Organization:
> Eclipse Foundation, Inc.
> To:
> 'Bjorn Freeman-Benson' <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> References:
>
>
>
> At a minimum, we should try to be consistent with the naming requirements
> for incubating projects.  Including a notice file in the root directory
> indicating the status of the distribution would also help.  What will the
> person accessing the file be presented with?
>
> Janet Campbell