Re: [rt-pmc] FW: EclipseLink 1.1 Review Slides

[Thomas Watson <tjwatson@xxxxxxxxxx>]

+1

I have the same concerns as Jeff. I would like to know if there are other projects with the Eclipse community and the RT project in particular that are planning to integrate or use EclipseLink in their projects.

Tom



Jeff McAffer ---02/03/2009 04:00:38 AM---I'm ok with the release but would like to know more about the status of Equinox and OSGi integration and adoption. "Equinox" d

From:	Jeff McAffer <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:	Runtime Project PMC mailing list <rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	02/03/2009 04:00 AM
Subject:	Re: [rt-pmc] FW: EclipseLink 1.1 Review Slides

---

I'm ok with the release but would like to know more about the status of Equinox and OSGi integration and adoption.  "Equinox" does not appear at all in the slides and "OSGi" appears once.  What moves have been made to increase the integration with and adoption of Equinox?  Is that work done and I missed it?

Jeff

Douglas Clarke wrote:

Fellow RT-PMC Members,

Please find attached the EclipseLink 1.1 release we are planning for mid-February. We are seeking PMC approval to proceed with our release.

We have already completed the review and approval of our IP Log for this release.

http://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseLink/IPLog

Doug



---


_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
 _______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc