If EF is willing to host it, it is no problem to set up a bridge from Matrox to Slack within few hours. We can also investigate if it would be possible to simply use iJUG's bridge. -Markus Von: jakarta.ee-wg [mailto:jakarta.ee-wg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Marcin Kruglik via jakarta.ee-wg Gesendet: Montag, 13. November 2023 14:03 An: Jakarta EE Working Group Cc: Marcin Kruglik Betreff: Re: [jakarta.ee-wg] Call for Participant Members It's great that you already have offered help with the technical aspects of it. Also, using open software for communication fits perfectly into what Eclipse Foundation is representing. Not sure how much trouble it would be to integrate it with existing communication channels (mainly Slack). as already said on EclipseCon, your initiative is very welcome and I agree to Markus and Tobias to use an open and federated system, when we not want to stay with a mailing list solution. Matrix then is the obvious choice at the moment. Am 12.11.23 um 16:24 schrieb Tobias Frech: Hi! I am not sure I reach you on the mailing list as I am not a member of it. But of course I support Markus' proposal to build upon a federated and open solution for your infrastructure needs. From my personal perspective it is essential that we extend the support for federated/decentralized solutions. As such I also offer some free support if someone wants to run an own Jitsi or even a Workadventure instance for live meetings. We had very good experiences with Jitsi especially for smaller (< 15 p.) meetings.
Matrix has worked as good as Slack for our needs so far. In some aspects I even prefer it over Slack.
Best Tobias Thank you for this great idea! The Eclipse Foundation is running a Synapse-driven Matrix Infrastructure, just as the iJUG does. As the iJUG's Vice Ambassador at the EF, and as a member of the iJUG Infrastructure Team (and iJUG Matrix Admin), I would like to propose that we are setting up a Matrix Chat Room on the EF's Matrix Infrastructure, and invite all the mentioned people to join it. Regarding Jan (iJUG Ambassador at the EF) and Tobias (iJUG Executive Board Member, JUGS) I am pretty sure both would support that, as I just gave Jan a Matrix account at the iJUG's Matrix Infrastructure recently, and as Tobias himself is also part of the iJUG Infrastructure Team (and iJUG Matrix Admin, besides me, Marcus Fihlon from JUG CH and iJUG Executive Board Member Stefan Koospal from JUG Deutschland). The iJUG recently decided to run a Matrix-based integrational infrastructure, i. e. we are running a Matrix-Slack-Bridge and could help the EF with setting up their own, so people like Hendrik that prefer Slack over Matrix would be able to join. -Markus EF Committer Member iJUG Vice Ambassador at iJUG iJUG Infrastructure Team / iJUG Matrix Admin
Dear Jakarta EE participating members, A few weeks ago, during the EclipseCon I had the pleasure of meeting with some representatives of participating members (Jan and Tobias from the iJUG, Hendrik from the OpenElemens, Arjan and David from the Omnifish, as well as all the folks from a guest member SouJAVA). It was great to speak with you and get your perspective on the Jakarta EE. However, the participating group in the Jakarta EE working group has 15 members. As your representative in the Steering Committee, I would like to create a communication channel with all of you. This would help to represent your views, expectations, and priorities to the committee and to achieve one of the project's strategic objectives, which is to grow the number of Working Group members. If you think this is something that would benefit your organization's involvement in the Jakarta EE project, please let me know.
-- Frech IT GmbH / Am Brünnele 7 / 71642 Ludwigsburg phone : +49-(0)7141-9113037 / HR B 744851 / AG Stuttgart
Geschäftsführer: Tobias Frech mobile: +49-(0)172-7112352 / email: tobias@xxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________ jakarta.ee-wg mailing list jakarta.ee-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-wg
|