[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [ecf-dev] Issue adding custom serialization to ecf provider

On 7/3/2017 5:50 AM, Peter Hermsdorf wrote:

Hi Scott,

Am 30.06.2017 um 19:19 schrieb Scott Lewis:

Yes it would be better, but it would mean a breaking API change unfortunately.

I've reopened bug https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=516074

made the addition, and pushed to master.ÂÂ Our hipp instance appears to me to be down right now, but once it comes up there will be a build available that includes this change.ÂÂ I can/will do a maintenance release to include it, but the question is when?
Thanks again.

Regarding the contribution of a bundle with a Kryo serializer and an example:

* where to contribute?

My inclination is to add/invite you to the ECF organization at github, and create a new repo for this.

* open a bug and create a gerrit change request or should i start something on my github repo and that might be moved to the ECF repo when reuqired?

I think the answer for this depends upon what the scope of the additions will be:ÂÂ e.g. is it a whole new distribution provider (even if based upon existing providers like the generic)...e.g. does it have it's own, new container and Namespace types?ÂÂ If the answer is 'yes' then I would say that you can start something on your repo, and/or we could move it to ECF org at right time, and then...if that's your desire...we can/could move it to eclipse.org.

* I would modify one the existing "hello" or timeservice examples, ok? (i remeber that one of them already had code which uses an ISharedObjectContainer which I also need to register the serializer)

IMHO the timeservice example would be better than the 'hello' examples...as the timeservice examples use OSGi RS/RSA...which is preferred due to the standardization. Or, if you have some new example/test code, that would be even better.

I've created a separate bundle for the de-/serializer which uses the DynamicImport-Package directive in the manifest - works as expected. The other stuff regarding "handling different package version" was not obvious enough for me to integrate in the first shot - maybe you or someone else can add / modify that later ...

Yes.ÂÂ This may already be essentially 'dealt with' by the RSA proxy creation and the generic provider...unless I'm misinterpreting what you are saying.



Bye, Peter

ecf-dev mailing list
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit