Re: [wtp-incubator-dev] [XQDT] SSE versus DLTK

[David Carver <d_a_carver@xxxxxxxxx>]

Lionel,

There is an open bug for this.

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=292704

There is some initial work being done there, but contributions are always welcomed.

Dave

On 03/18/2010 10:43 AM, David M Williams wrote:

This seems like a great idea to me.

For some reason, I could not find any response from the XQuery team on this mailing list.  (hint hint :)

From:	Lionel Villard/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
To:	wtp-incubator-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date:	03/05/2010 02:33 PM
Subject:	[wtp-incubator-dev] [XQDT] SSE versus DLTK
Sent by:	wtp-incubator-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

Dear XQDT developers,

I got very interested in using XQDT for writing my XQueries and even more interested in thinking of what could be done to make it more powerful. So I've started to look at the plugin dependencies and noticed that it XQDT is based upon DLTK. I was surprised since the other XML editor (XML, XML Schema, XSL) are all based on SSE. So my question is why choosing DLTK versus SSE? Would it be a problem to integrate XQDT to the other X* editors? For instance, in the debugging view, it would be valuable to synchronize the XQuery view with the XML view.

Thanks!
Regards,
Lionel_______________________________________________
wtp-incubator-dev mailing list
wtp-incubator-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-incubator-dev

_______________________________________________
wtp-incubator-dev mailing list
wtp-incubator-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-incubator-dev