Re: [tcf-dev] [tm-dev] Hudson instance per project for TCF and TM

["Stieber, Uwe" <Uwe.Stieber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Anna,

Looks really good. Thanks for all the work. :)

The new job is delivering to the download area too, isn't it?

...
main:
     [copy] Copying 169 files to /home/data/httpd/download.eclipse.org/tools/tcf/builds/development/nightly
...

We probably should avoid this till we turned off the old job. At the moment it does mean that we have two jobs updating the download area.

@Martin: Do we have a migration plan to the TCF hudson instance? Guess we need to have a plan till when to migrate all jobs and when to turn off the old jobs.

Thanks again.

Best regards, Uwe :)



> -----Original Message-----
> From: tcf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tcf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anna
> Dushistova
> Sent: Freitag, 25. Oktober 2013 02:14
> To: TCF Development
> Subject: Re: [tcf-dev] [tm-dev] Hudson instance per project for TCF and TM
> 
> Hi All,
> There it is:
> https://hudson.eclipse.org/tcf/
> I've migrated a tcf-master job to try it out. Seems to be working fine so far.
> 
> Anna.
> 
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Oberhuber, Martin <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi Anna,
> >
> >
> >
> > IMO the biggest advantage of HIPP is that we're more isolated from
> > central Hudson ... which appears to be unstable at times, probably due
> > to the huge load of so many projects. Having our HIPP would mean we
> > can proceed when the central Hudson goes down.
> >
> >
> >
> > CDT is already using HIPP as far as I know , I have asked them about
> > their experiences on the cdt-dev mailing list.
> >
> > http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cdt-dev/
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > --
> >
> > Martin Oberhuber, SMTS / Product Architect - Development Tools, Wind
> > River
> >
> > direct +43.662.457915.85  fax +43.662.457915.6
> >
> >
> >
> > From: tcf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tcf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> > On Behalf Of Anna Dushistova
> > Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2013 7:16 PM
> > To: TCF Development; tm-dev
> > Subject: [tcf-dev] Hudson instance per project for TCF and TM
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Dave D. asked me last week to look into getting a separate Hudson
> > instance for TM.
> >
> > According to http://wiki.eclipse.org/Hudson, HIPP instances are
> > recommended for those projects who prefer flexibility and convenience
> > with their CI system, perhaps at the expense of security and webmaster support.
> >
> >
> >
> > What I like about HIPP:
> >
> > 1) Flexibility(we can have additional plugins, we can create jobs
> > ourselves, it can be configured to write into a project's downloads
> > area and can be given write access to the code repository for
> > automatic tagging of builds);
> >
> > 2) Gerrit verification job can be migrated there (right now it's
> > running in sandbox which seems to be going away some time soon).
> >
> >
> >
> > What I am concerned about:
> >
> > It is not entirely clear for me if it's possible to run UI tests on
> > HIPP (wiki page mentions that shared instance is recommended for
> > running all the
> > tests) and I don't really want to split our jobs into separate build
> > job and test job.
> >
> >
> >
> > What do you think? Do we want a HIPP or not?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Anna.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > tm-dev mailing list
> > tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tm-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> tcf-dev mailing list
> tcf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tcf-dev