Re: [tcf-dev] [tm-dev] Hudson instance per project for TCF and TM

[Anna Dushistova <anna.dushistova@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi All,
There it is:
https://hudson.eclipse.org/tcf/
I've migrated a tcf-master job to try it out. Seems to be working fine so far.

Anna.

On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Oberhuber, Martin
<Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Anna,
>
>
>
> IMO the biggest advantage of HIPP is that we’re more isolated from central
> Hudson … which appears to be unstable at times, probably due to the huge
> load of so many projects. Having our HIPP would mean we can proceed when the
> central Hudson goes down.
>
>
>
> CDT is already using HIPP as far as I know , I have asked them about their
> experiences on the cdt-dev mailing list.
>
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cdt-dev/
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Martin
>
> --
>
> Martin Oberhuber, SMTS / Product Architect – Development Tools, Wind River
>
> direct +43.662.457915.85  fax +43.662.457915.6
>
>
>
> From: tcf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tcf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Anna Dushistova
> Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2013 7:16 PM
> To: TCF Development; tm-dev
> Subject: [tcf-dev] Hudson instance per project for TCF and TM
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> Dave D. asked me last week to look into getting a separate Hudson instance
> for TM.
>
> According to http://wiki.eclipse.org/Hudson, HIPP instances are recommended
> for those projects who prefer flexibility and convenience with their CI
> system, perhaps at the expense of security and webmaster support.
>
>
>
> What I like about HIPP:
>
> 1) Flexibility(we can have additional plugins, we can create jobs ourselves,
> it can be configured to write into a project's downloads area and can be
> given write access to the code repository for automatic tagging of builds);
>
> 2) Gerrit verification job can be migrated there (right now it's running in
> sandbox which seems to be going away some time soon).
>
>
>
> What I am concerned about:
>
> It is not entirely clear for me if it's possible to run UI tests on HIPP
> (wiki page mentions that shared instance is recommended for running all the
> tests) and I don't really want to split our jobs into separate build job and
> test job.
>
>
>
> What do you think? Do we want a HIPP or not?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Anna.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tm-dev mailing list
> tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tm-dev
>