Re: [stem-dev] Unofficial STEM version control?

[Matthew Davis <mattadav@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Tero,

I think a GitHub account is great.  It will offer a good source 
history/pedigree for Eclipse legal to perform due diligence when (if) you 
opt to contribute source code back to STEM.  As Dan mentioned, the Eclipse 
Public License provides a lot of flexibility when it comes to 
redistribution, so there should be no legal issues if you need to copy 
STEM source into your repository.

-Matt


stem-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 09/14/2010 09:55:46 AM:

> From: Tero Parviainen <tero.parviainen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "stem-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <stem-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 09/14/2010 09:56 AM
> Subject: [stem-dev] Unofficial STEM version control?
> Sent by: stem-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> Hi,
> 
> As I start to do more experimentation with server-side STEM, I'd 
> like to have my work available in version control somewhere.
> Is there some unofficial SVN repo for STEM that I could use? If not,
> do you mind if I host a "modified" fork the trunk on my Github 
> account? That way I'd be able to keep up with trunk as well as 
> extract clean, up-to-date patches later when I have something to 
> contribute upstream.
> 
> Br,
> Tero
> _______________________________________________
> stem-dev mailing list
> stem-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/stem-dev