Re: [rt-pmc] ECF 3.9.0

[Eclipse Management Organization <emo@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Oh... and we need IP Log approval.

Wayne

On 07/23/2014 02:04 PM, Wayne Beaton wrote:

Richard and I do monitor the PMC lists, so there's a very good chance that we'll see these sorts of requests. It's better, though, if you send a note.

Pending PMC approval, we'll open the review.

Making this more automatic is on my list. It's obvious that you want to schedule a review; we should be able to pick up on that without further intervention from you.

Wayne

On 07/23/2014 07:10 AM, slewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Ok, I've updated the description on the ECF 3.9.0 release page [1] with
technical details about the RSA 1.1 support for 3.9 release.  I've also
requested a review to be scheduled for 7/30.

I'm sending this response rather than sending an email to emo as the PMI
suggests.   Wayne please let me know if more notification needs to be
sent.

Thanks,

Scott

[1] https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/rt.ecf/reviews/3.9.0-release-review

There's no specific requirement to produce "Slideware". We changed this
years ago. I have been accepting any reasonable PMC-approved
documentation (in a variety of file formats) for some time. The PMI has
fields for everything that you might normally put in a slide deck.

I haven't made using the PMI for review documentation a hard requirement
(yet), but have tried to make it darned convenient for those purposes.

FWIW, almost all of the review fields are optional. I'm generally happy
with a decent description of the release and a list of issues (which you
seem to have sorted out already).

I would like to see a little more information in the plan (including a
theme or two), but that's a battle that I'll fight later. Very often--at
least in this case--a decent description serves for planning purposes as
well.

Wayne

On 07/21/2014 02:51 PM, Scott Lewis wrote:

On 7/21/2014 11:37 AM, Thomas Watson wrote:

I know several RT projects have done completely away with the
slideware for releases.  For example, I just filled in the necessary
information on projects.eclipse.org for the last equinox release [1].

I've already listed our 3.9 release in the portal, and so it does now
appear (Aug 1) here:

https://projects.eclipse.org/

But I had assumed that I would still need to produce slideware for a
minor release.  If this isn't the case that's obviously fine with me.

It was pretty lightweight and I think you will need to at least fill
in that information for your release.  Is this expected to go into
Luna SR1?

Hadn't really thought about that, honestly.   I think it would mostly
depend upon how quickly the EEG finalizes the R6/RSA 1.1 spec and
ct.   There is some work for them to do as I understand (e.g. merge
eeg/rsa_1_ into master, final changes/additions to CT, etc).   I don't
think we would want to release 3.9 before the CT has been at least
informally finalized by eeg, although maybe I just don't understand
the eeg spec/ct release process.   In any event, I don't know if that
can happen in time for Luna SR1.

One other complicating factor wrt Luna SR1, however, is this bug [1].
It's not remote services (rather filetransfer), but whatever is
expected from ECF to deal with it should probably be a part of ECF 3.9
also.

 I would support such a release going into SR1, but we may need to
get Ian Bull to take it forward to the planning council for approval
of a minor version upgrade.  I don't think this should be an issue.

Ok with me.

Also, you and I likely need to coordinate the enterprise companion
code CQ to make sure it is updated with the final bits and gets
approved in time for your release.

Ok.   FWIW I've been using what's latest on eeg/rsa_1_1 for testing.
As you say we can coordinate on the CQ about the final bits.

Scott




_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc

--
Wayne Beaton
Director of Open Source Projects, The Eclipse Foundation
<http://www.eclipse.org>
Learn about Eclipse Projects <http://www.eclipse.org/projects>
EclipseCon Europe 2014 <https://www.eclipsecon.org/europe2014>
_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc

_______________________________________________
rt-pmc mailing list
rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc

--
Wayne Beaton
Director of Open Source Projects, The Eclipse Foundation
Learn about Eclipse Projects

--
Wayne Beaton on behalf of the Eclipse Management Organization