[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [rt-pmc] Planning Council
|
Based on what Wayne said I am wondering if this is within the purview
of the Planning Council at all now :/
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:57, Glyn Normington <gnormington@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 22 Jul 2011, at 16:29, Jesse McConnell wrote:
>
>> I know that Glyn is hot on the topic of tracking down specific release
>> requirements as they relate to rt projects..
>
> Yes, if that includes release train requirements. I'd like the RT PMC and the Planning Council to agree the minimum requirements for a RT project to participate in the Eclipse release train. There's just too much in the current set of "must dos" for Virgo to be able to justify the cost.
>
> I am not aware of anything that would prevent Virgo from having joined the Indigo release train if we had wanted to, apart from the stipulated requirements. ;-) You see if we'd plopped Virgo 2.1.1 in the Indigo deliverables, I don't think a single user would have blinked. Yes, some may have whinged about the lack of a p2 repo, but they'd soon see that as a missing feature to be added later (Virgo 3.5 as it turns out).
>
> Glyn
> _______________________________________________
> rt-pmc mailing list
> rt-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rt-pmc
>
