Re: [polarsys-iwg] Phone Call Maturity Assessment next Monday 17.11.2014

["Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona" <jgb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Talking about existing projects, and depending on the project, in some
cases you can track "feature requests" in the issue tracking system, as
requirements. But not all projects are that formal about this.

In other cases (notably, I know about OpenStack), you have blueprints,
that are not exactly requirements, but could maybe be a good proxy for
them.

As Boris suggested, we could explore how to include this in next steps.
Thanks for the feedback!

Saludos,

	Jesus.

On Fri, 2014-11-14 at 08:26 +0000, Oscar Slotosch wrote:
> Hello Boris,
> I am not an expert in RE, but for me the following metrics would be interesting
> (they require also some traceability from Requirements to Code/Tests, e.g. using @Req-tags in the code):
> * Number of requirements
> * Number of Requirements per Code 
> * ratio of implemented requirements
> * ratio of tested requirements
> 
> For me the missing requirements are the most urgent extension for Eclipse meta-information.
> If we would have a Requirements (or feature) tab for each plugin, this would be the biggest steps 
> forward towards systematic development using Eclipse since the introduction of EMF;-)
> 
> kind regards,
>        Oscar Slotosch
> -- 
> Validas AG
> Dr. Oscar Slotosch
> Vorstandsvorsitzender
> mailto:slotosch@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.validas.de
> fon: +49 (0) 89 / 53 88 669-11
> fax: +49 (0) 89 / 53 88 669-10
> --
> Validas AG
> Firmensitz: Arnulfstr. 27, D-80335 München
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht München HRB 131653
> Vorstand: Dr. Oscar Slotosch (Vorsitzender), Dr. Peter Braun, Jan Philipps
> Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Manfred Broy
> 
> 
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: polarsys-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:polarsys-iwg-
> > bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Boris Baldassari
> > Gesendet: Freitag, 14. November 2014 09:12
> > An: polarsys-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > Betreff: Re: [polarsys-iwg] Phone Call Maturity Assessment next Monday
> > 17.11.2014 4pm UTC
> > 
> > Le 14/11/2014 08:47, Oscar Slotosch a écrit :
> > > Hello Boris,
> > Hello Oscar,
> > 
> > > Big progress since last time I had a look to it.
> > > I specially liked the testing metrics.
> > Good!
> > 
> > > What I was missing is something like "Number of Requirements".
> > > Do you see a chance to measure something, eventually in the tracing
> > system?
> > I'm afraid that requirement management is not part of the current scope.
> > It is nevertheless a major part of maturity, and will be one of the
> > priorities for the next version of the tool, along with other areas like
> > reviews (gerrit).
> > 
> > As for the metrics I cannot tell, as of today, what we can measure
> > regarding requirements -- of course, it heavily depends on the tracking
> > system and not all projects would have such information available. Any
> > input on this topic would be greatly appreciated as a preparation for
> > the next round...
> > 
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > Boris
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > > Kind regards,
> > > 	Oscar
> > > PS
> > > Not sure If I can make it on monday
> > >
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > polarsys-iwg mailing list
> > polarsys-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
> > from this list, visit
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/polarsys-iwg
> _______________________________________________
> polarsys-iwg mailing list
> polarsys-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/polarsys-iwg

-- 
Bitergia: http://bitergia.com
/me at Twitter: https://twitter.com/jgbarah