[ormf-dev] Should we change our JVM requirement to Java 6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[ormf-dev] Should we change our JVM requirement to Java 6

From: Joel Rosi-Schwartz <Joel.Rosi-Schwartz@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 16:10:30 +0100
Delivered-to: ormf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/ormf-dev>
List-help: <mailto:ormf-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ormf-dev>, <mailto:ormf-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ormf-dev>, <mailto:ormf-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

We have a several problematic CQs because of our usage of JAX-WS 2.0 when running under Java 5. Seeing as JAX--WS comes out of the box with Java 6, if we moved our minimum JVM to 6 these could all be dropped. We still have to find a work around to the Java 6 bug 6741342 that is the root of our issue number 240579, but this must be addressed as a matter of priority in any case.

Both Barbara and I are in favour of this move. Does anyone have any considerations?

Joel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ormf-dev] Should we change our JVM requirement to Java 6
  - From: Ingenierubüro Ponikwar (ORMF)
- Re: [ormf-dev] Should we change our JVM requirement to Java 6
  - From: Achim Loerke

Prev by Date: Re: [ormf-dev] Rough Cut: Eclipse Modeling Project: A Domain-Specific Language Toolkit
Next by Date: Re: [ormf-dev] Should we change our JVM requirement to Java 6
Previous by thread: [ormf-dev] Rough Cut: Eclipse Modeling Project: A Domain-Specific Language Toolkit
Next by thread: Re: [ormf-dev] Should we change our JVM requirement to Java 6
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs