Re: [orbit-dev] Archiving Pre-Oxygen (4.7) Releases

[Wim Jongman <wim.jongman@xxxxxxxxx>]

Yes. I agree. I was just pointing out which content I think is frequently hit and can therefore not be moved to archive.

On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 3:26 PM Gunnar Wagenknecht <gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Nov 6, 2018, at 15:22, Wim Jongman <wim.jongman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I'm with Gunnar. In addition, the site promises "long term"[1]. That is at least 5 years if not 10.

I know that IBM is still using Neon for a lot of their offerings which in turn force a large group of ISV's to also stick with Neon.

Just a clarification - I'm not against archiving. I actually like it a lot. I just don't like to see a composite being created the redirects traffic to archive.eclipse.org. 

FWIW, every organization building products should be using an internal mirror/proxy anyway to not be blocked from external outages. 

-Gunnar

-- 
Gunnar Wagenknecht
gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://guw.io/

_______________________________________________
orbit-dev mailing list
orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev