Re: [orbit-dev] Archiving Pre-Oxygen (4.7) Releases

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [orbit-dev] Archiving Pre-Oxygen (4.7) Releases

From: Gunnar Wagenknecht <gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 15:26:27 +0100
Delivered-to: orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/private/orbit-dev>
List-help: <mailto:orbit-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev>, <mailto:orbit-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/options/orbit-dev>, <mailto:orbit-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Nov 6, 2018, at 15:22, Wim Jongman <wim.jongman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I'm with Gunnar. In addition, the site promises "long term"[1]. That is at least 5 years if not 10.

I know that IBM is still using Neon for a lot of their offerings which in turn force a large group of ISV's to also stick with Neon.

Just a clarification - I'm not against archiving. I actually like it a lot. I just don't like to see a composite being created the redirects traffic to archive.eclipse.org.

FWIW, every organization building products should be using an internal mirror/proxy anyway to not be blocked from external outages.

-Gunnar

--
Gunnar Wagenknecht
gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://guw.io/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [orbit-dev] Archiving Pre-Oxygen (4.7) Releases
  - From: Wim Jongman

References:
- [orbit-dev] Archiving Pre-Oxygen (4.7) Releases
  - From: Roland Grunberg
- Re: [orbit-dev] Archiving Pre-Oxygen (4.7) Releases
  - From: Gunnar Wagenknecht
- Re: [orbit-dev] Archiving Pre-Oxygen (4.7) Releases
  - From: Wim Jongman

Prev by Date: Re: [orbit-dev] Archiving Pre-Oxygen (4.7) Releases
Next by Date: Re: [orbit-dev] Archiving Pre-Oxygen (4.7) Releases
Previous by thread: Re: [orbit-dev] Archiving Pre-Oxygen (4.7) Releases
Next by thread: Re: [orbit-dev] Archiving Pre-Oxygen (4.7) Releases
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs