On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:40 PM, William Piers <
william.piers@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm William Piers (M2M-ATL commiter).
> I will contact Frédéric Jouault (M2M & M2M-ATL lead) about 2).
>
> Best regards,
>
> William
>
> Le 09/11/2011 15:14, Ian Skerrett a écrit :
>
> FWIW, I really appreciate Ed's initiative on my original request to change
> the name. We are starting an M2M industry working group at Eclipse so it is
> nice to not have the confusion.
>
> I haven't heard from the M2M project leader on the initial request so I was
> wondering if the Modeling PMC could 1) finalize this decision to rename and
> 2) make sure the M2M project leader is still engaged.
>
> Thanks
> Ian
>
>
> On 11/6/2011 1:07 AM, Ed Willink wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> +1
>
> Ed
>
> On 06/11/2011 05:58, Ed Merks wrote:
>
> Ed,
>
> Perhaps the T could be for Transformation instead of for Tools.
>
> Cheers,
> Ed
>
> On 05/11/2011 4:57 PM, Ed Willink wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> It has become clear that M2M meaning Model-to-Model is largely an Eclipse
> usage, whereas the Machine-to-Machine usage is becoming globally prevalent.
> It therefore seems prudent to revise the Eclipse usage now while Modeling
> M2M usage is limited rather than in perhaps 5 years time when it may be much
> harder.
>
> It has already been at least half agreed that the Machine-to-Machine
> consortium can use the
eclipse.org/m2m URL, but surely much more will be
> required.
>
> Most URL usage is non-m2m, since ATL and QVTd now drop the m2m from their
> project-specific URLs and plugin ids; QVTo has yet to make this
> simplification. So future unqualified M2M usage is largely restricted to a
> few administrative pages and vintage academic references. Therefore handing
> over the entire
eclipse.org/m2m space is not that hard, particularly if
> colliding web pages have a redirect.
>
> The Modeling/M2M project name does not have to change, since it is
> qualified, but if Machine-to-Machine is to be significant, we may want it
> too to do some modelling, so the ongoing Modeling usage may be embarrassing.
>
> I therefore propose that Modeling/M2M be renamed as Modeling/MMT (Model to
> Model Tools).
>
> Regards
>
> Ed Willink
> _______________________________________________
> modeling-pmc mailing list
>
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
>
> _______________________________________________
> modeling-pmc mailing list
>
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG -
www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.1869 / Virus Database: 2092/4598 - Release Date: 11/05/11
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> modeling-pmc mailing list
>
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
>
>
> --
> Ian Skerrett
> VP of Marketing and Ecosystem
> Eclipse Foundation
> Tel:
613-224-9461 ext 227
> Blog:
ianskerrett.wordpress.com
> Twitter: IanSkerrett
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> modeling-pmc mailing list
>
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> modeling-pmc mailing list
>
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
>
>