Re: [modeling-pmc] GMF Committer Vote for Boris Blajer

[Sébastien Demathieu <sebastien.demathieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ed, all,

That makes sense to me. In that case, I understand the note I sent previously can be interpreted as
approval by the PMC, unless someone has any concern.

Thanks,

Sébastien

Ed Merks a écrit :
> Rich,
>
> Yes.  So we should expect to see a note posted to the modeling-pmc 
> mailing list by a project lead (PMC member) giving their approval 
> whenever a new committer is added to any model project.  That note will 
> be interpreted as approval by the PMC (and if someone does have a 
> concern, that's an opportunity to express it).
>
>
> Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
> mailto: merks@xxxxxxxxxx
> 905-413-3265  (t/l 969)
>
>
>
>
> *Richard Gronback <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>*
>
> 10/31/2006 10:31 AM
>
> 	
> To
> 	Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
> cc
> 	Bjorn Freeman-Benson <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, 
> <modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject
> 	Re: [modeling-pmc] GMF Committer Vote for Boris Blajer
>
>
> 	
>
>
>
>
>
> But they’ll need to ask for approval on the PMC mailing list, as a 
> formality it seems.  Just to be clear.
>
> Thanks,
> Rich
>
>
> On 10/31/06 10:28 AM, "Ed Merks" <merks@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Rich,
>
> Yes, that makes good sense.  And since every project lead is a PMC 
> member (a pattern we probably want for the new projects as well), that 
> means projects can handle the issue entirely within their domain.
>
>
> Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
> mailto: merks@xxxxxxxxxx
> 905-413-3265  (t/l 969)
>
>
>
> *
> Richard Gronback <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>* 10/31/2006 10:22 AM
>
> To
>
> Bjorn Freeman-Benson <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> cc
>
> Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA, <modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Subject
>
> Re: [modeling-pmc] GMF Committer Vote for Boris Blajer
>
>
>
>
> Great, thanks Bjorn.
>
> I'm assuming nobody has an issue with this, so let's move to the any PMC
> member is sufficient to consider Committer additions approved model.
>
> Best,
> Rich
>
>
> On 10/31/06 10:18 AM, "Bjorn Freeman-Benson"
> <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  > Yeah, the Charters all have this phraseology that gives the PMC a final
>  > go/no-go decision about each Committer election. Not sure why, but it's
>  > been there from the beginning. We (the EMO) consider any one of the PMC
>  > members to be speaking for the whole group, so a quick "approved" from
>  > any PMC member is sufficient.
>  >
>  > We even do this in Technology: see for example:
>  > _http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/technology-pmc/msg00175.html_
>  >
>  > Richard Gronback wrote:
>  >> Hi Bjorn,
>  >>
>  >> Just some history on the email Ed just sent.  It's up to 
> interpretation, so
>  >> yours is welcome.  We'd obviously like the avoid a change to our 
> charter.
>  >>
>  >> Thanks,
>  >> Rich
>  >>  
>
>
>
> --
> Richard C. Gronback
> Borland Software Corporation
> richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
> +1 860 227 9215
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> modeling-pmc mailing list
> modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc