Re: [modeling-pmc] Eclipse Model-to-Model Transformation (M2M) Project P

[Sébastien Demathieu <sebastien.demathieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Frédéric,

In the proposal, I read "ATL is a QVT-like language but is not, in the present state, 100%
compatible with the 12 levels of compliance stated in the OMG document".

It is also stated: "It is anticipated that several bridges may be established between ATL and
various other transformation languages."

Does it mean that you plan to bridge ATL with a QVT language (according to syntax-related compliance
points), so that one can write rules using a QVT-compliant syntax and execute it on ATL?

Thanks in advance for the clarification,

Sébastien

Frédéric Jouault a écrit :
> Please find an updated proposal for the Eclipse Model-to-Model
> Transformation (M2M) project attached to this message.
>
> This new version uses the required template.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Frédéric Jouault
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> modeling-pmc mailing list
> modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc