[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [modeling-pmc] GMF Committer Vote for Boris Blajer
|
Rich,
Yes. So we should expect to see
a note posted to the modeling-pmc mailing list by a project lead (PMC member)
giving their approval whenever a new committer is added to any model project.
That note will be interpreted as approval by the PMC (and if someone
does have a concern, that's an opportunity to express it).
Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
mailto: merks@xxxxxxxxxx
905-413-3265 (t/l 969)
Richard Gronback <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
10/31/2006 10:31 AM
|
To
| Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
|
cc
| Bjorn Freeman-Benson <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
<modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
Subject
| Re: [modeling-pmc] GMF Committer Vote
for Boris Blajer |
|
But they’ll need to ask for approval on
the PMC mailing list, as a formality it seems. Just to be clear.
Thanks,
Rich
On 10/31/06 10:28 AM, "Ed Merks" <merks@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Rich,
Yes, that makes good sense. And since every project lead is a PMC
member (a pattern we probably want for the new projects as well), that
means projects can handle the issue entirely within their domain.
Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
mailto: merks@xxxxxxxxxx
905-413-3265 (t/l 969)
Richard Gronback <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
10/31/2006 10:22 AM
Bjorn Freeman-Benson <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA, <modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [modeling-pmc] GMF Committer Vote for
Boris Blajer
Great, thanks Bjorn.
I'm assuming nobody has an issue with this, so let's move to the any PMC
member is sufficient to consider Committer additions approved model.
Best,
Rich
On 10/31/06 10:18 AM, "Bjorn Freeman-Benson"
<bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yeah, the Charters all have this phraseology that gives the PMC a
final
> go/no-go decision about each Committer election. Not sure why, but
it's
> been there from the beginning. We (the EMO) consider any one of the
PMC
> members to be speaking for the whole group, so a quick "approved"
from
> any PMC member is sufficient.
>
> We even do this in Technology: see for example:
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/technology-pmc/msg00175.html
>
> Richard Gronback wrote:
>> Hi Bjorn,
>>
>> Just some history on the email Ed just sent. It's up to
interpretation, so
>> yours is welcome. We'd obviously like the avoid a change
to our charter.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Rich
>>
--
Richard C. Gronback
Borland Software Corporation
richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1 860 227 9215