Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [linuxtools-dev] Using a Dockerfile language server for the Docker editor...



On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Roland Grunberg <rgrunber@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 2017-07-26 at 17:12 +0300, akurtakov wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Remy Suen <remy.suen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 9:31 PM, akurtakov <akurtakov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > The last one would be the most time consuming as we will need all the CQs
> > > and etc. so we can distribute the language server with Linux Tools.
> >
> > Is it a fair assumption that someone who installs the tools has Docker
> > installed locally? If that is the case, perhaps the language server
> > could be wrapped as a docker image and then the plug-in would just use
> > `docker run` to launch and connect to it? Or is this idea a little too
> > crazy?
>
> And the image is distributed as part of Linux Tools? This looks a bit too much to me.

Couldn't it all be generated ? I mean as long as Docker is on the
system, we could :

Pull the 'node' image from the Dockerhub repository, build a new image
from the Dockerfile that Remy specified earlier (we could certainly
package the Dockerfile), run that new image (as a container) and then
simply connect to it from the client side.

IMHO this makes the Dockerfile editor totally unreliable as any network glitch and etc. will render it useless.

Alex
 

Our only real 'pre-requisite' is that a Docker daemon exists on the
system, but that's basically the same pre-requisite that the Docker
Tooling itself has, or any plugin that relies on the existence of a
commandline tool.


Cheers,
--
Roland Grunberg
_______________________________________________
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev


Back to the top