<mailto:
akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
On 20:25:35 Friday 28 October 2011 Jeff Johnston wrote:
> Actually, I just realized I am mistaken regarding the next
release part
> of this. Our 0.9.1 release will be an Indigo update and built
from the
> stable-0.9 branch, not master. So, Alex, are we fine marking our
Juno
> milestone builds as 1.0.0 or should we have waited until our final
> milestone?
Personally, I would prefer if we mark them as 0.10 until we are
really sure we
can sign by these API.
What others think?
Alex
>
> -- Jeff J.
>
> On 10/28/2011 12:50 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> > Hi Francois,
> >
> > In working on the Juno build, I noticed that you bumped up
Profiling,
> > Callgraph, and Valgrind to 1.0.0 as well as the main pom.xml as
part of
> > following the releng wiki. 1.0.0 is a special version number.
The actual
> > next release should be 0.9.1.
> >
> > Alex, can we down-grade these on the nightly update site? It
would mean
> > any user that managed to update from there would have to
uninstall and
> > re-update to see any updates in the next bit. I can rebuild this
> > afternoon.
> >
> > -- Jeff J.
> > ______________________________
_________________
> > linuxtools-dev mailing list