[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [linuxtools-dev] Some features have been pushed to 1.0.0 prematurely
|
On 20:25:35 Friday 28 October 2011 Jeff Johnston wrote:
> Actually, I just realized I am mistaken regarding the next release part
> of this. Our 0.9.1 release will be an Indigo update and built from the
> stable-0.9 branch, not master. So, Alex, are we fine marking our Juno
> milestone builds as 1.0.0 or should we have waited until our final
> milestone?
Personally, I would prefer if we mark them as 0.10 until we are really sure we
can sign by these API.
What others think?
Alex
>
> -- Jeff J.
>
> On 10/28/2011 12:50 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> > Hi Francois,
> >
> > In working on the Juno build, I noticed that you bumped up Profiling,
> > Callgraph, and Valgrind to 1.0.0 as well as the main pom.xml as part of
> > following the releng wiki. 1.0.0 is a special version number. The actual
> > next release should be 0.9.1.
> >
> > Alex, can we down-grade these on the nightly update site? It would mean
> > any user that managed to update from there would have to uninstall and
> > re-update to see any updates in the next bit. I can rebuild this
> > afternoon.
> >
> > -- Jeff J.
> > _______________________________________________
> > linuxtools-dev mailing list
> > linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> linuxtools-dev mailing list
> linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
