Re: [linuxtools-dev] Some features have been pushed to 1.0.0 prematurely

[Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx>]

The plan for 1.0.0 is still Juno which is 06/2012.

-- Jeff J.

On 10/28/2011 02:22 PM, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta wrote:
> Any idea when it is going out of incubation?
>
> - Wainer
>
> On 10/28/2011 04:19 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> > Talked to Andrew who is at FSOSS. He agrees with the 0.10.0 solution
> > and is ok with back-leveling the nightly updates. We cannot go 1.0.0
> > while we are in Incubation.
> >
> > Francois, I can make these changes unless you have already started.
> >
> > -- Jeff J.
> >
> > On 10/28/2011 01:34 PM, Francois Chouinard wrote:
> > > I guess it doesn't hurt to mark them as 0.10 for now. Nothing prevents
> > > us from updating before Juno if we are happy with the APIs.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > <mailto:akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 20:25:35 Friday 28 October 2011 Jeff Johnston wrote:
> > > > Actually, I just realized I am mistaken regarding the next
> > > release part
> > > > of this. Our 0.9.1 release will be an Indigo update and built
> > > from the
> > > > stable-0.9 branch, not master. So, Alex, are we fine marking our
> > > Juno
> > > > milestone builds as 1.0.0 or should we have waited until our final
> > > > milestone?
> > >
> > > Personally, I would prefer if we mark them as 0.10 until we are
> > > really sure we
> > > can sign by these API.
> > > What others think?
> > >
> > > Alex
> > >
> > > >
> > > > -- Jeff J.
> > > >
> > > > On 10/28/2011 12:50 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> > > > > Hi Francois,
> > > > >
> > > > > In working on the Juno build, I noticed that you bumped up
> > > Profiling,
> > > > > Callgraph, and Valgrind to 1.0.0 as well as the main pom.xml as
> > > part of
> > > > > following the releng wiki. 1.0.0 is a special version number.
> > > The actual
> > > > > next release should be 0.9.1.
> > > > >
> > > > > Alex, can we down-grade these on the nightly update site? It
> > > would mean
> > > > > any user that managed to update from there would have to
> > > uninstall and
> > > > > re-update to see any updates in the next bit. I can rebuild this
> > > > > afternoon.
> > > > >
> > > > > -- Jeff J.
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > linuxtools-dev mailing list
> > > > > linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > linuxtools-dev mailing list
> > > > linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > linuxtools-dev mailing list
> > > linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Francois
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > linuxtools-dev mailing list
> > > linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linuxtools-dev mailing list
> > linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> linuxtools-dev mailing list
> linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev