Re: [linuxtools-dev] Opxml question

[Maynard Johnson <maynardj@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 08:48 -0600, Maynard Johnson wrote:
>> Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 09:28 -0500, Andrew Overholt wrote:
>>>> * William Cohen <wcohen@xxxxxxxxxx> [2011-02-10 09:27]:
>>>>> On 02/10/2011 09:19 AM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
>>>>>>> what's the status of abandoning opxml?
>>>>>>> It seems to me that it's still in use...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The upcoming 0.7 release removes its use.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Andrew
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> linuxtools-dev mailing list
>>>>>> linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cool, that would allow the elimination of oprofile-devel and it's undesirable static libraries.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is 0.7 going to make it for Fedora 15?
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps.  I'll also have to verify my above statement :)
>>>
>>> The R0_7_0 tag and trunk don't use opxml anymore. What's left is some
>>> left-over code removal and documentation update.
> 
>> So I presume the updated oprofile plugin will leverage the native XML
>> output from opreport, right? 
> 
> Yes.
> 
>>  And how about the events list?  Does it
>> use the XML output from ophelp? 
> 
> Yes.
> 
>>  If so, this is really good news from
>> my perspective since (as I had noted in my Jan 14 posting) the current
>> version of this plugin is completely broken for IBM Power systems.
> 
> We would very much appreciate feedback about the Eclipse oprofile
> plug-in >= 0.7.0 on IBM Power systems.
My team member, Daniel (on cc), will have a look.  I presume he should install from http://download.eclipse.org/technology/linuxtools/updates-nightly?

Thanks.
-Maynard
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> --Severin
>