[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [linuxtools-dev] Opxml question
|
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 08:48 -0600, Maynard Johnson wrote:
> Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 09:28 -0500, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> >> * William Cohen <wcohen@xxxxxxxxxx> [2011-02-10 09:27]:
> >>> On 02/10/2011 09:19 AM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> >>>>> what's the status of abandoning opxml?
> >>>>> It seems to me that it's still in use...
> >>>>
> >>>> The upcoming 0.7 release removes its use.
> >>>>
> >>>> Andrew
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> linuxtools-dev mailing list
> >>>> linuxtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Cool, that would allow the elimination of oprofile-devel and it's undesirable static libraries.
> >>>
> >>> Is 0.7 going to make it for Fedora 15?
> >>
> >> Perhaps. I'll also have to verify my above statement :)
> >
> > The R0_7_0 tag and trunk don't use opxml anymore. What's left is some
> > left-over code removal and documentation update.
> So I presume the updated oprofile plugin will leverage the native XML
> output from opreport, right?
Yes.
> And how about the events list? Does it
> use the XML output from ophelp?
Yes.
> If so, this is really good news from
> my perspective since (as I had noted in my Jan 14 posting) the current
> version of this plugin is completely broken for IBM Power systems.
We would very much appreciate feedback about the Eclipse oprofile
plug-in >= 0.7.0 on IBM Power systems.
Thanks!
--Severin
