| Re: [linux-distros-dev] Sucessful Creation Review! |
Hey,
* Ben Konrath <bkonrath@xxxxxxxxxx> [2006-11-23 13:01]:
>
> On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 11:18 -0500, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> <snip>
> > Is "linux" too broad? Perhaps linuxdistros? linuxtools? Anyone have
> > any suggestions?
>
> I think we need to separate out the two distinct tasks that this project
> is trying to complete:
>
> 1) Packaging the Eclipse Platform and other Eclipse Plugins
> (eclipse.org and 3rd party)
> 2) Creating a suite of plugins to make Linux application development
> with Eclipse sweet ... errr, I mean easy :)
Very good point. This will help with the development planning as well.
> So how about we have two name spaces:
>
> org.eclipse.linux.tools.*
>
> and
>
> org.eclipse.linux.packaging.*
>
> This is just a suggestion - it might actually be a little long.
No, I like them. Anyone object?
> I think something like LinuxTools as the Bugzilla Product would be
> better because LinuxDistros seems like everything in that product would
> be tied to a Linux distribution.
I'd like to keep a LinuxDistros component so that we have the possibility
of people re-categorizing bugs if they suspect distro-specific stuff.
Rather than just having us CCd on bugs they suspect are packaging issues :)
> Also, could you add 'Packaging' or
> 'PackagingTools'? This would be used for code like the language pack
> formatter that Kyu is working on.
Definitely. So, unless someone objects, we'll go with this initially:
LinuxTools
PackagingTools
ChangeLog
OProfile
RPM
LinuxDistros
Thanks,
Andrew
Attachment:
pgpSbH8eVHPbq.pgp
Description: PGP signature