Re: [iam-dev] Re: Problem depending on two versions of a bundle

[Abel Muiño Vizcaino <amuino@xxxxxxxxx>]

No problem, I've placed the question.
http://www.eclipse.org/newsportal/article.php?id=778&group=eclipse.platform.pde#778

I'm not sure I've explained it properly, so if you feel like more  
detail can be provided, please do so.

El 02/12/2008, a las 20:34, Carlos Sanchez escribió:

> sorry, didnt have the time and most likely I wont in the next days :(
> rolled back to 3.3
> maybe the problem with lucene is incompatible ranges.
>
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Abel Muiño Vizcaino  
> <amuino@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Another bit of information... our target platform contains two  
> > versions of
> > javax.wsdl (1.4.0 and 1.5.1) and also two versions of
> > org.apache.commons.lang (2.3.0, 2.1.0).
> >
> > For some reasin, it seems to only complain about lucene...
> >
> > Weird!
> >
> > El 02/12/2008, a las 20:10, Abel Muiño Vizcaino escribió:
> >
> > > I found this on the newsgroups:
> > >
> > > http://dev.eclipse.org/newslists/news.eclipse.technology.equinox/msg01623.html
> > >
> > > It states that two versions of a bundle can be active at the same  
> > > time (as
> > > expected). This is according to the OSGi spec and is reported by  
> > > the equinox
> > > team.
> > >
> > > The problem must then be on our side or the PDE tooling... Carlos,  
> > > did you
> > > get the time to report the problem to the PDE guys?
> > >
> > > El 02/12/2008, a las 8:27, Abel Muiño Vizcaino escribió:
> > >
> > > > Carlos, can you forward the question to the PDE or Equinox teams?  
> > > > It
> > > > should be possible to have a bundle installed with several  
> > > > different
> > > > versions.
> > > >
> > > > BTW: The target platform script only installs the bundles  
> > > > required for
> > > > building (i.e. it lacks the UI part). It probably makes sense to  
> > > > add those
> > > > (although not strictly required) for manual testing (maybe having  
> > > > a separate
> > > > target platform for that?)
> > > >
> > > > El 02/12/2008, a las 2:30, Carlos Sanchez escribió:
> > > >
> > > > > I have gone through all the setup and finally everything builds  
> > > > > fine
> > > > > in eclipse.
> > > > >
> > > > > Now the problems. If I try to run it as an eclipse application I  
> > > > > get
> > > > > conflicting issues with lucene. Clicking on validate the  
> > > > > configuration
> > > > > it says that org.eclipse.help.base needs lucene 1.9,2.0 and then  
> > > > > we
> > > > > require 2.1,2.2, so even checking both lucene 1.9 and 2.1 it  
> > > > > doesnt
> > > > > validate.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2008/12/1 Abel Muiño <amuino@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > I'm on it :-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We can not release 0.x versions without a release review, so it  
> > > > > > will be
> > > > > > an snapshot or milestone.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > BTW: we already missed M1 and M2 was scheduled on Dec 1, so it  
> > > > > > seems
> > > > > > like we need to update the project plan.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 1:27 AM, Carlos Sanchez
> > > > > > <carlos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > > if you were able to set it up already, can you publish a  
> > > > > > > developer
> > > > > > > build?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 3:27 AM, Abel Muiño Vizcaino
> > > > > > > <amuino@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > > > I've set up a new "main" page for all the topics related to  
> > > > > > > > setting a
> > > > > > > > development environment for IAM.
> > > > > > > > http://wiki.eclipse.org/IAM_Environment
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This includes getting the source code and configuring the  
> > > > > > > > target
> > > > > > > > platform
> > > > > > > > (currently 3.4) only.
> > > > > > > > http://wiki.eclipse.org/IAM_Getting_Sources
> > > > > > > > http://wiki.eclipse.org/IAM_Target_Platform
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The part about the target platform is automated, although it  
> > > > > > > > needs
> > > > > > > > some
> > > > > > > > love... for example versions of the dependencies are not  
> > > > > > > > specified at
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > moment. I've marked this with TODOs on the wiki.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > With a target platform in place, we should be closer to get  
> > > > > > > > automated
> > > > > > > > builds
> > > > > > > > going.
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Abel.
> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > iam-dev mailing list
> > > > > > > > iam-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iam-dev
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > iam-dev mailing list
> > > > > > > iam-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iam-dev
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Abel Muiño - http://ramblingabout.wordpress.com/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > iam-dev mailing list
> > > > > > iam-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iam-dev
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > iam-dev mailing list
> > > > > iam-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iam-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > iam-dev mailing list
> > iam-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iam-dev